C++ Yo

If I read Bjarne Stroustroup's book, "The C++ Programming Language," will I know everything about C++?

Will I be able to then start reading a book on OpenGL and maek gaemz?

Ah. A wonderful morning of fucking with religion-loving dingdongs and politics-loving dingdongs. Fine.

Anyway, go learn OpenGL once you understand the language. Or even before, that might be exciting!

grow a vagina and some boobs and you can do all that and more, without the need to learn anything

>>1
You don't need to know all of seeples to do openGL. In fact, you don't need to know any at all if you use C instead. And you can do quite a bit of games and simulations without using dynamic memory allocations. Just allocate all your game entities in a global array and get some display and update loops, and get key and mouse events. It might sound like terrible design to use a global array (and it might be), but it will actually achieve optimal performance.

If you think you need sepples you might aswell stuff a cactus dipped with chilly sauce up your ass.

But this would be bad for the cactus i think.

If I read Bjarne Stroustroup's book, "The C++ Programming Language," will I know everything about C++?

no, you will be just another idiot who thinks he knows C++ because he read a book, you will use C++ constructs without understanding what is underneath and just program "by the book" and then end up cursing C++ for being a clusterfuck and go back to C like a crying little bitch who sucks on Denis Ritchies dead dick

>>6
In all fairness, C++ is pretty much a clusterfuck.  I'm not sure that going back to C is the best alternative, though.

>>7
in all fairness, youve failed to learn C++, and you blame the language by saying its a clusterfuck instead of admitting you do understand what is going on. if you read a book, and do what the book tells you without understanding why it works that way, what you learned will always be "magic" and you will be helpless to do anything when it doesnt work the way the book told you it would work. you dont know C++, you just know things like objects, methods and constructors are supposed to do certain things to data you put in them, and now its all a clusterfuck and you blame Bjarne, its not your fault you dont really know what an object is, you dont really know how a method is connected to an object, constructors should just always work because the book told you they always work, and when they dont work, its because they are a clusterfuck, not because you dont actually know jack shit of what is going on underneith. go ahead, keep failing at C++ and blaming it for being a clusterfuck so you can get sent back to your PHP web programming work and leave the 100k a year C++ jobs to people who actually bothered to learn the language

if it's c++ , it's crap

>>7
yeah, seeples with conventions is the best. It doesn't take much to make C suitable, but it doesn't quite have it by itself.

>>8
C++ is a clusterfuck. If you actually make use of the more powerful features of C++, any reader of the code is bound for a world of hurt. One thing I hate about it is its outstandingly complicated grammar. While all popular languages have context-free (or "nearly" context-free) grammars, while C++ has undecidable grammar.

The only practical way to make use of C++ is to define a subset of features to use and strictly adhere to that standard. If I had to restrict myself in such a manner, I'd much prefer to make full use of a different language that isn't as mind-numbingly obtuse if I could choose to do that.

>>8
When you get down to it, C and C++ are nearly the same language. A lot of C projects have ad-hoc implementations  of many conceps from C++. Personally I just don't like OOO due to being raped by a rabid java programmer as a youth so I stick to C.

>>12
OOP, not OOO*

>>13
Learn to spell you no talent bitch.

>>14
There is a difference between a spelling mistake and a typo.

>>15
Again, you are a no talent bitch.

>>15
It's safe to ignore him after you've made your peace. He's one of /prog/'s many shitposters.

bampu pantsu