Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

MYTISCHI

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-06 9:19

The kid, I WENT TODAY AND SHORT OF MARKET SEEN IN STATIKODIBILA Mike "TEORKAT," Well, I jumped up and SHARPLY PEREEBAL him in SCHSCHI with turntables and explain it SCREAM 'NO LOVE METAABSTRAKTSII "because I'm on the topology of fumes, kid SPIRIT OF THE OLD SCHOOL LIVES ONLY IN PHYSICS WHERE TO EBASHATSYA hardcore, kid LIVE WHERE ENERGY, YOUNG AND SYSTEM fuck in her mouth! Only the topology Infinitesimal Analysis, Theory of Lie groups ONLY! UNITY ULTRAHARDKOR LISP! boys ebashte hachey, Fu antiantifu, pidarasnyu, and hachkiblyadkov baytoebov ugorayte to gigs, love my family, kids, and CHART! TALK openly and boldly in the face! (add1 358)! p.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-06 9:48

I get it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-06 10:24

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-07 8:47

Tomorrow on the internet looking for a book Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Fuck if you do not understand. Then you go on and study http://www.schemers.org/Documents/Standards/R5RS/ standard from start to finish. Then cram, that bitch, learn by heart the convention of writing code lispovogo - Emacs lisp indentation, so that bounced away from the teeth. How do I convert a factorial that gave at least 5000 of the Fibonacci numbers in the second, you can go further - you'll get a fascinating world of macros. LAMBDA, super-fast store CONS, MAP and REDUCE. Suction Hickey dzhangoblyadkov / losers just like reyfaga or sisyarp / python-cocksucker who suck dick for life will not take long, and in four years you will write such an article in the TFG that any habroblyad will flow at the mere mention of your thesis topic.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-07 8:51

LISP no longer a language. LISP - just a clingy shit on the shoes of anonymous expert, smeared with a thin layer around the / s /. Anononimny judge made ​​the mistake of trampling LISP. Now, suffering, trying to clean the sole of that smelly stuff. Lodged firmly. You know, just nothing more to add to what has already been written here. Normal person of such humiliation is enough to feel the insignificance of the shit he Force. But when you're dealing with lispofanboem - it is quite another matter. It will poison your LISPom the air long after trampling.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-07 8:54

IS LISP WITH TIME CUBIC?

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-07 8:56

me dunno

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-07 8:58

Wow I'm on /prog/ at the same time as the sussman and the other guy

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-07 9:07

Speak lisp? Me not. My speaks no lisp. Sweat. Girlie has tits. Mom has tits too. Dynamically cocksuck. Mom's tits. Lisp. Jews invented mathematics. Sussman sucks my moms tits.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-07 10:32

>>11
Nice dubs, bro.

Name: Salvador Dalí 2012-04-07 13:22

It's just me or /prog/ is becoming surreal?

Name: VIPPER 2012-04-07 13:56

>>11
No, lisp has always been the most used language there is.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-08 14:58

Not satisfied with HTML? So your zapili, the S-expressions, with preference and poet! Be a man, baa!

First you have to write a validating parser to pull-S-expressions. Standard lispovy reader will not return AST, has not yet parse every last bracket, and on the web should be interpreted as possible to begin immediately.

Then you write the parser and validator of its DSL-unique HTML and CSS, and begin to implement the renderer. At this point, it is found that there is no quality to Lisp bindings to the modern GUI-toolkit. First you take a cffi-cairo and cl-cairo2, but it turns out that they are incarcerated under the old version of Cairo, and do not work.

You will become dopilivat Cairo-bindings, but once you decide that Cairo is semantically alien Lisp paradigm and take your writing cross-platform library to support high-performance vector graphics. Then you realize analog protocol HTTP, only the S-expression (let's call it SXTP), because HTTP URLs with its squalid and methods semantically alien Lisp paradigm.

After this will be a question about writing a web server that supports SXTP. Along the way you write template engine, analogues of XPath, XSLT, as well as the ORM and MVC-framework. At this point, it turns out that traditional SQL-database semantically alien paradigm, Lisp, and you begin to develop their own Lisp-oriented database.

At this point, you realize that Common Lisp is overloaded and insufficiently expressive, his standard is inflated, and the macros are unhygienic; that the Scheme is too minimalist and academic, that the other dialects of Lisp, or marginal, or require .NET / JVM. Then your mind will create its own idea of ​​Lisp. You spend a few years to develop a standard implementation of the language and rewriting all of the above on your new language. After that, it turns out that all terribly slow. And this, of course, solely for the reason that the operating system standard POSIX semantics, Lisp alien paradigm. You will begin to develop LISP OS.

In the process of developing it turns out that the effective LISP OS for x86/ARM/MIPS can not be created, in principle, since the semantics of Lisp alien paradigm. Will you take up the study System C, Verilog, VHDL, and one day sozdash Lisp machine on the FPGA.

At this point, Mosaic magically work out. You will be Lisp-machine Lisp-OS, Lisp and Lisp server browser. You enthusiastically look back around, and find that half of humanity has moved to Gliese 581, and the remaining half of forgot about HTML / CSS / etc., How about a nightmare, and has long enjoyed by quantum computers and quantum networks. But all this will no longer be important. You got to be Lisp-browser and a full replacement of HTML / CSS on S-expressions.

Yes, and you will not live so long, because by this time you'll be a decrepit old man.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-08 15:31

>>13
Back to Jewish Autonomous Oblast, ``Khazar''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-08 17:10

>>13
It's funny because it's true.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-08 18:28

Why would anyone want to write alternative HTML? One should really hate it!

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-08 18:41

Need to write a tutorial on monads, "Study of Haskell to bend." With theses:

     Forget about the do-notation and the more list comprehensions - is too little understood symbols and cattle.
     let and where - for suckers, supplies all the huge lambda, let everyone see what you have a cool one-liner.
     Functions should be called none other than f and f ', and they should look just as fabcd = ab (cd). There are no annotations, and the more comments.
     Pointfull - for suckers, everyone should see how you are able to ((.) $ (.)).
     Do not forget to use the fix instead of recursion, everyone will understand that you have the right kid.
     Participate in all spetsolimpiadah where you want to count the number with the Integer. Other problems to solve is not necessary, because then you're closer when Haskell will be mainstream and not be able to bend all.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-08 18:51

Весь /c/ в чятике?

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-09 4:39

>>1
Please take your shit out of /prog, nobody here cares about your ``memes''.  ИДИ НАХУЙ ПИДРИЛО ЩЯ ПЕРЕЕБУ с вертушки.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-09 4:50

ХУЯМП

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-10 21:25

>>22
nice dubs bro

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-10 21:46

What is this? Back to /b/ please.

Name: Anonymous 2012-04-10 22:46

My name a Borat. Is nice.

Name: bampu pantsu 2012-05-29 4:13

bampu pantsu

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List