Go

Go is a statically typed, compiled language with a dynamic and lightweight feel. With Go you get the efficiency benefits of being close to the machine–your programs compile to native code–with the productivity and quick turnaround of a scripting language.
Why do they keep saying it "feels" like a dynamic scripting language? I don't get a fraction of the compile-time I errors I get with Go when I write in C. It "feels" like a clusterfuck of a compiled language. What the fuck is lightweight about it? You don't have to call free? Big fucking deal. Stop comparing it to scripting languages.

It's displacing Javascript as the Ruby of curly-braced languages, not by market share, but by how unjustifiable its existence is, and how idiotic its fanboys are.

The syntax is lighter than mainstream compiled languages, you don't have to declare implementation of interfaces, and it compiles fast (usually sub second). That's why it's described as lightweight.

>>2
i_don't_know_WHAT_the_fuck_is_going_on.jpg

>>4
That certainly seems to sum it up in regard to Go's design.

Go's compiler is inefficient and statically links a huge library with your program so it ``feels'' like a dynamic scripting language packaged with PAR or py2exe instead of compiled to native code.

>>4,5
4deep6u

sage for programming thread in my /g/

>>1-6
u mad because Go is better than your toy language