Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Alternatives for GCC

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-14 13:52

I have written a project I actually want to sell and I'd prefer to not have to tangle with the GPL license. Please recommend me a good alternative to GCC. It needs not be free.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-14 13:53

>>1
In my hurry I have forgotten to include the actual language. Sorry. Its ANSI C (or later).

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-14 13:59

Are you looking for an alternative to the GPL license or an alternative to GCC? The former makes more sense, but just to confirm...

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-14 14:00

Touhou C Compiler

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-14 14:02

>>3
The former. I am a bit scatterbrained at the moment. Sorry. I am looking for a compiler I can use that does not forces me to use the GPL.

Name: VIPPER 2012-03-14 14:05

Does GCC really force you to GPL your shit?

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-14 14:17

GCC doesn't force GPL upon you. That's bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-14 14:37

Can I use GPL-covered editors such as GNU Emacs to develop non-free programs? Can I use GPL-covered tools such as GCC to compile them?


Yes, because the copyright on the editors and tools does not cover the code you write. Using them does not place any restrictions, legally, on the license you use for your code.

Some programs copy parts of themselves into the output for technical reasons—for example, Bison copies a standard parser program into its output file. In such cases, the copied text in the output is covered by the same license that covers it in the source code. Meanwhile, the part of the output which is derived from the program's input inherits the copyright status of the input.

As it happens, Bison can also be used to develop non-free programs. This is because we decided to explicitly permit the use of the Bison standard parser program in Bison output files without restriction. We made the decision because there were other tools comparable to Bison which already permitted use for non-free programs.


If a library is released under the GPL (not the LGPL), does that mean that any software which uses it has to be under the GPL or a GPL-compatible license?


 Yes, because the software as it is actually run includes the library.


You are fine as long as you do not use any GPL libraries.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List