/prog/ - do large c projects reinvent parts of c++?

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:08

for instance, does the linux kernel "reinvent" some c++-ish idioms?

also, it seems a lot of large projects are in c++. many games, every big name web browser, for instance.

if you were to, say, write chrome in c, would you naturally reinvent parts of c++?

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:14

You will never write a working computer program.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:45

>>2
is that a sentence?

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:45

or a statement?

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:47

for instance, does the linux kernel "reinvent" some c++-ish idioms?
Sort of. Most of the time they're subtly different from how C++ does them. If you wanted to do them that way in C++, you would still have to implement it by hand.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:22

Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:40

>if you were to, say, write chrome in c, would you naturally reinvent parts of c++?

Reinvent is kinda of the wrong word.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:42

Every program after Hello World reinvents the i++

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:43

>>7
>re-implement C++ functionality

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 3:05

C++ reinvents complex C projects.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 3:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 8:49

>>1
Yes, for example in Linux kernel (written in C) threads are implemented from scratch. In C++ you could just #include <thread>.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 8:52

c++
Betta not make me angry, bitch, if you aint ready to suck a cock. Capiche?

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 9:00

>>12
Linux kernel
I hear you already! So you want it in the ass - you'll fucking get the full length of it!

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 9:37

>>12
I wonder why they don't even use POSIX threads. It's blatant NIH!

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 11:53

>>12,15
So they could just magically use threads without a threading environment? How is the kernel supposed to use pthreads when it doesn't run even run in a POSIX environment?

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 12:13

>>16
You missed the joke.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 13:21

C++ was written in C.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 13:51

yes, but they do it right

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 14:12

>>17
You're still a fucking moron.

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 14:58

>>20
u buttfrustrated?

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 14:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 18:18

LISP

do large c projects reinvent parts of c++?

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:08

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:14

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:45

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:45

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:47

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:22

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:40

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:42

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:43

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 3:05

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 3:35

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 8:49

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 8:52

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 9:00

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 9:37

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 11:53

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 12:13

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 13:21

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 13:51

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 14:12

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 14:58

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 14:58

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 18:18

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:08

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:14

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 20:47

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:42

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-05 23:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 3:05

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 3:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 8:49

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 8:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 9:00

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 9:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 11:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 12:13

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 13:21

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 13:51

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 14:12

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 14:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 14:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-06 18:18