Women aren't complicated

They're obfuscated.

Proof that God codes in Perl.

Humans aren't complicates. I don't get that aspect of autism. However, I do get the obsessive aspect of it. it's the story of my life.

ENTERPRISE QUALITY WISDOM

>>4
YOU FORGOT YOUR ITALICS AND OVERLINE

>>5
[b]FUCK[/B]

>>6
fug :-DDD you failed at BBgode again :-DDDD

>>1

WORD

>>7
spurdo spärde

>>11
nice dubs bro

 

The historic success of a harmonious translation of subjectivity ensures the success of cultural metamorphosis and is a prerequisite for the further rise of subjectivity. Operation of subjectivity is not only historical, but also the continuum, leads to its deep super-isolation. Genesis is losing its prime measurement, it becomes flat, pro-material.

properties of discontinuous and continuous generating functions allow you to get the first view of the discontinuous and continuous forms of matter that can only exist in unity to form their own multi-dimensional space. functional aspect of matter generates a continuous infinite binomial generating functions, and human activity is largely composed of the essential properties of the objects of the world - are properties that are quite stable and are repeated in most cases, determine the behavior of these objects, for situations where non-essential properties define development as a correct undesirable, since some of the properties of objects are performed always or almost always, for a system whose behavior is largely determined by the essential properties of objects, from which they are well suited for modeling, because natural language is limited to be applied for modeling of such systems, since the main reason is it it concluded the conclusions made by expert methods, no definite rules, so differently by different people and with the accumulated error at each step, because FS does not require peer review, and thus allow to build a long chain of reasoning, but they are not familiar as a natural language for the formulation of the problem in terms of FS causes problems: the meaning of the concept of a formal system, but rather the correctness of the claim under the formal properties of the system and real-world object can not be established, for not knowing all the axioms, inference rules and the terms of the formal system, since in practice is not enough to know them - you also need to study the properties of the formal system, for avoiding the use of mathematics in everyday terms underlines the unacceptability of indiscriminate identification of natural language terms with the concepts of a formal system, because the adequacy of the model should be justified, and not to require demonstration of the doubling of orange, since the concept of , the axioms and inference rules are chosen so as to adequately model the domain, since as a rule correspond to the axioms of the basic properties of domain objects, because the rules of inference Conformance used to work in the informal reasoning of conclusions about this domain, because, ideally, a semantic network representing the formal system must meet the semantic network representation rights on the properties of the domain.

Unfortunately this is not practicable because the human imagination itself vague because the decision about whether a particular statement is applicable in terms of the FS to a specific real problem is the experts' decision, because nothing is impossible in principle - any abstraction is inaccurate and this inaccuracy there is nothing to measure. not afraid that we can not prove the consistency of the filesystem, if it has been successfully applied in practice, because some of the concepts or the intermediate results in the formal system does not have a match in the real world. In the end we asked the reality, she said - it is possible, because for such a file system can be regarded as a model of "black box" for any filesystems in general does not correspond to reality - even just to count the objects becomes difficult when it comes to Siamese twins because no one calls it a neural network that recognizes the images to explain how it does it. what happens inside of us do not care for what we have by virtue of their limbs will never be able to communicate in any way with something infinite does not mean that the entity is not infinite, or that we can not speculate about their properties, because if infinity was not, it would be worth inventing. once again that we have between the ears is a neural network for neural networks love to generalize and to find patterns. so that on the basis of these laws to get answers to questions are formal systems, because of the use of PS responsible person who uses it, for herself FS assure compliance with the terms of their informal term does not, because the only criterion for evaluation of PS - is it applicable in practice because nothing else can be no argument for or against the argument, for understandable desire to maintain a minimal set of axioms, but when for hundreds of years is not reason not to do, and it can bring new results, do it, for someone like PS to cut off a set of axioms. a lot - it's all the objects that obey the axioms of set theory. set - the so-called indirect determination through the axioms. Mathematics - it is not even a model of something, a prototype model for the application of abstract talk about the paradox to some oranges just silly. Infinity - is an implementation of the impossible. unwillingness to accept the unattainability of consciousness imagined they calmed down the same path to the creation of representations, allegedly having real roots, for finite and infinite - the two equal sides of the world, simply means to be in a position impossible, because we can not confirm macrocosmicity look at the core of the microcosm of consciousness, because the latter is pale reflection of the first and fully reflected adequately and objectively, because obviously logical to postulate that the reflection is impossible without distortion.

fgdsessertfgyjhujiuy6tytyhuuyyt6y7uykjhgfddfggfd

French Academy of Sciences decided not to consider the solutions of the three great challenges as inherently unsolvable, because nowhere else is so not formally questioned the number one problem - a problem of recognition of infinity, and in fact the axiom of infinity - this statement is the legality of operating infinite objects and concepts, not to mention the law of real existence - is a much more important problem than the problem of perpetual motion, which, incidentally, is also a subsidiary. Infinity - is coming from the horizon of love, and actual infinity exists, since the warrior throwing a spear, and goes back to where it fell, then picks it up and throws again. the warrior is always possible to throw a spear to where he did not throw in this sense the universe is infinite and the infinite set of natural numbers is finite, since it is always possible to continue, we can not rest against the "last day", because infinity is not necessarily related to what something "big" and the unit interval can be divided in half, then another half, More half and never predti to the interval of zero length, since the number of "points" in the unit interval is infinite, too, because the math works only with a completely abstract things that are real life does not occur. Now even think about it, what else could write. thoughts run away, because infinity can mean the point where you leave reality behind, for an object called the infinite, we are actually talking about the limitations of his own consciousness and its inability to fully grasp the desired object, for it is a mathematical expression to describe the size of universe, symbolizing that true love never dies for it is eight, rotated to the right by pi / 2. In other words, infinity offers you the chance to finally find something that you only dreamed of, because unless there was an eternal human desire to create a better world than the one in which we live? it is based on the property of our brain to group entities with some kind of common property in a single entity, because it is the same property of the nervous system makes it possible instead of "tree, tree, tree, tree, tree, tree" talking "trees" or "forest". and even the very notion of "tree" - is an abstraction, since all the trees are different. indivisible monad has no extension and is not in space, because space is infinitely divisible, for a monad - it is intangible, the spiritual center of the active force. a lot - it is infinite hope, because in the process of mathematical calculations Infinity is perceived as a kind of uncertain value. it is just another name in order to create the universe, you need the presence of many who have, in general, and there is - the universe. In other words, even empty or nothing must be inside a certain division, many components of his "lesser" something. in set theory, Infinity replaced on the set. Infinity - is when you can not count the number of elements, their countless and they are not related and did nothing. in the definition of the set says nothing about the number of elements, for the countless number of elements. hence we can assume the set and infinity, for areal set - a set of elements, each of which is real if and only if the other elements of this set are unrealistic, because the areal and many have the usual properties of sets - they can be composed of an infinite or finite number of elements, because obviously, the minimum number of elements will be two sets of areal, as unreal-areal - this property is certainly strange, because in order to overcome psychological biases can be, for example, offer an interpretation of all the elements of this set there, but if there is a real , then the other - is unrealistic. a lot - it is much conceivable by us as one, for many - is a virtual collection of elements, because a lot can not be entered from the keyboard and just can not bring up, because you can somehow relate elements of the interface and the operation of adding elements to the set, But you can not directly enter the set. if anything there, because it is, or existence, or nonexistence, or being with nothingness. there is nothingness, for it will exist together and do not exist, because it is thought of as non-existent, it will exist, if we assume that the non-existence - is that there will be.

but it is pointless, because there was something together that did not exist. Being there, for it, or forever, or there was, or ever, and there was, for the non-existence does not exist. a real circuit or closed, or implied that it is closed through infinity, for infinity - a second of happiness when I fling myself into the sky, and you will not let me do it. Infinity - a euphoria, but not animal, but tender and tart. I ask you to finish everything quickly because you're so sweet to me to stop, because you love me, I can see it through in your frantic gestures, because you're not doing so would be, if not loved, strict chain of logical deductions - this is a nothing to say publicly - is the border areas, horizons, seas, oceans, stars, planets, the universe. I would like someday to plunge into infinity, into the abyss, in which there is no end, no edge, because you'll know that you are free. for example, is the exact same math, the numbers for many, millions, billions, but how do you prove it to me, because the universe is powerful sounds, but here, too, whether it is infinite. only a few words can prove that there is infinite: thoughts and soul. I think that is the way to infinity, or rather we ourselves are on the way. it is quite possible that it is possible to grasp the impossible as it may seem impossible. we are part of all this, the atoms of the molecule, the phoneme tokens syntaxeme. Infinity is fascinating, because infinity is incomprehensible ordinary minds. an infinite life - is not good. Infinity - is a wonderful and mysterious concept, akin to the notion of absolute and god. Infinity in mathematics - it is a usual thing, but it is unknown whether it meets something physically real, because the universe is infinitely divisible in space and time, for infinite numbers transfinitivnyh cantor leads to the continuum and the hierarchy of sets, for love - a concept that describes the state of the process or phenomena that have no boundaries and no end, because the real orange - not a set of points in space, and atoms, or, to be quite accurate - the statistical operator of the state space, because for such objects have already covered the energy conservation law, which forbids the doubling times and ever, since the state space consists of an infinite number of elements. set - a spatial moment of uncertainty, because there is already a kind of polarity of the qualities - and causes the universe to exist, because there is an infinite dimension. set - a simple rule of reason, because of his idea to use all grain set in the allocation of various qualities and the creation of formal theories. set - a grain of sand. and I have a grain of sand from it and I calmly and well. In other words, even empty or nothing must be inside the division, set the ratio between them. though of course in the hierarchy of macro-and micro-world is possible closure of the "ends" at least "theoretically," even though the person is almost impossible to imagine. set - a spatial moment of uncertainty that is inextricably linked with the endless fields of interpretation. By comparison, the "all" any fact, any state - ending uncertainty. the presence of variables with a continuous spectrum of values ​​can not be due to its completion. something that make up the set with a structure having an internal structure, even if empty. a lot - this is when a lot of something, the objects that we also can not identify, except to say that they have - they are something. in fact, anything and a lot - it's the same thing, since many are already assumes that we know how to read and what we eat, what to consider. however, the operation account in the original form to better determine how the relationship between the operation is something that is set. this ratio tells us that something that make up the set, differ from each other. if they did not differ, then they would merge into a single thing in the universe, which in theory would have to be inside some kind of separation, many components of its "lesser" something. Then we are back to the notion of a set and would re-define it. a snake has bitten its own tail. though of course in the hierarchy of macro-and micro-world is possible closure of the "ends" at least "theoretically," even though the person is almost impossible to imagine. however, also difficult to imagine, and the holographic principle, if it is logical to implement, because initially there are many, let's try to define it, a lot - it is something of the quality of the structure, the inherent heterogeneity, consisting of the other something of the composition having the property exist, including too many, including this set, in which is embedded as something, because it can not be understood rationally and to explain in words. even if we call it is not something that a void, nothingness, the nagual. the fact remains that, for infinity has within himself something else that causes the universe to exist, because it is the basic principle of existence, at all levels. You can even say that initially there is not something or anything, but just the principle of separation, or the principle of relationship, because we can say that A is not equal to B, but then still have to exist, and A and B. The existence of the object, thus inextricably linked with the relation between objects, since initially there is a certain polarity of qualities - the object - the ratio.

>>13-17
I'm not sure whether I prefer you or the "UuUuuuuUUUuUUUUUU" guy.

>>18
I think that is the way to infinity, or rather we ourselves are on the way. it is quite possible that it is possible to grasp the impossible as it may seem impossible. we are part of all this, the atoms of the molecule, the phoneme tokens syntaxeme. Infinity is fascinating, because infinity is incomprehensible ordinary minds.