>>3
At least I have the mental capacity to properly quote something, you stupid piece of shit.
C++ is a fucking joke, suck my balls.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 19:45
>>6
You're just upset because, if given the same problem, you wouldn't have been able to solve it right away. Nice job princess. You're below average. Now go run off and get ready to serve your shift at Burger King.
>>7
It's easy you stupid piece of shit, if you think this is hard you should tell your mother to reconsider her choice of not having an abortion despite letting some mental midget inseminate her. Fuck off back to /g/ you fucking retard.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 19:51
>>8
It's easy because >>1 alrady posted a solution you fucking no talent programmer. Also, you lame ass unoriginal bitch, come up with your own one liners instead of stealing mine.
>>10
Go away. You are dumb and boring. Seriously. Your grammar sucks, you really don't know how to write code, and the extent of your arguments is stealing my one liners. Nice job nigger. You're below average!
>>12
It's the ultimate challenge in functional languages. Haskell experts have been trying and failing for years now.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 19:58
>>12
For you yes. For me no, because, unlike you, I know how to write code. Again, there is as vast difference between saying you can do something and actually doing it. Hence why suck dick.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 19:59
>>14 Hence why suck dick.
I think you need to take your pills.
>>14
Well, I hope you have a fulfilling life creating those text triangles.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 20:09
>>17
I believe being able to solve the problem is what is known as basic problem solving. This is something that you seem to lack. By the way, I'm way beyond that you idiot. I do stuff like implement various types of optical flow algorithms and a bunch of other things that are wll beyond your limited mentality.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 20:10
>>17
I've also contributed code to the apache hadoop project. Again, this is stuff well beyond your limited mental capacity.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 20:13
>>18 By the way, I'm way beyond that you idiot.
I'm not convinced, you seem to think creating text triangles are difficult, which indicates that you're a stupid mouthbreathing piece of shit.
>>19
Yeah, was it a text triangle?
Were the Apache devs amazed at your incredible text triangle code?
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 20:15
>>20
Stop projecting. That is you who things creating text triangles are difficult. Again, please tell us what you do for a living you mental midget you.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 20:16
>>21
Do you see a text triangle anywhere in the source code you mental midget? Exactly. Now shut up and go scrub another toilet you dumb nowhere bitch.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-18 20:19
>>21
And I find it amazing how someone like yourself, who has zero credentials, can be so lippy. Maybe you should shut up and perhaps learn something from those of us who can write the non trivial code. Oh wait. That would require you to think!
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-19 0:09
>>22 That is you who things creating text triangles are difficult
Do you mean ``thinks''? And I never said it was difficult, I said it was easy, you're the one who thought it was a monumental challenge you dumb piece of shit.
>>23
I don't look at the code of shitty toy projects like Apache, sorry.
>>24
You're the lippy one you fucking faggot, all you have done is to claim that you contributed code to some unscalable shit that performs poorly like Apache. I don't see any proof in this thread you fucking retard.
>>28
You still seem to think that creating a text triangle is hard, why is that? Are you really this fucking untalented?
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-19 15:31
>>32
No sir, that would be you. Now go off and continue to look like a dumbass when reading the apache hadoop source code you damn mental midget. Or better yet, give up your dreams of ever becoming a programmer, accept the fact that you are a zero talent bitch, and continue to smile as you scrub those toilets.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-19 15:54
>>32
Also you uncreative nigger, stop stealing my one liners and come up with your own. I know this might be kind of hard since you are a total dumbass, but at least try you dumb douche.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-19 20:54
>>33,34
Still no proof that you contributed to anything, even to shit projects like Apache.
>>35
Actually, now that I think about it, you still haven't demonstrated anything beyond the ability to call people names. What do you do for a living? Have you ever actually written a single line of production code in your entire life?
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 8:22
Sure is wannabe Kodak-sans in here. Wanting to grow up to be a aspirng java codemonkey must be lovely.
kodak_gallery_programmer!!kCq+A64Losi56ze
you still haven't demonstrated anything beyond the ability to call people names.
This applies to someone else in this thread, too. Just fuck off.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 9:29
>>41
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc,char *argv[]) { puts("Look at me writing my one liners, I'm just a cool ass java codemonkey that thinks triangles are so hard. Man, programming is so hard. I doubt other people could manage to do such things as I do with their limited mental capability."); }
>>46 >>47
Kodak-san, why do you samefag so much to try and make yourself seem anymore better than the next anonymous faggot on this board?
If anything you just make yourself look like a toilet scrubber who does nothing but sit on this board attempting to make fun of other people while failing to provide a single drop of evidence for your own success.
Your trolling is getting beyond ridiculously and I've quite had it with you and your java codemonkey manners.
With that being said, I have reported you. Hopefully moot decides to purge this board of shitposters like you that have the mental capacity of a 2 year old.
>>48
I'm not trolling. There was a discussion revolving around a similar problem like maybe 2 months ago. Dunno, I might actually dig up the pold post since are a total clueless douchebag.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:19
>>49
read >>50 you hoser. Geeze. Now I see why you all are in fact toilet scrubbers.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:20
>>50
kodak, you're a shitposter and a troll. You're everything wrong with tripfags. You are at times as bad as FrozenVoid and then on top of that you think so highly of yourself when in reality you're just a shitty java codemonkey.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:26
>>52
You're just mad because you still can't spot the undefined behavior in the program. Now pee wee, maybe you should give it a rest, find the old thread in question, try to follow it, and then see what I just saw right away.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:32
>>51
oh look, kodak is samefagging again to try and make himself more relevant.
>>53
>You're just mad because you still can't spot the undefined behavior in the program.
Really kodak? I never knew this whole time I was suppose to be looking for undefined behavior in the code posted. Way to completely switch the topic on us. It's not even hard to spot anyway considering the function `int main...' has no return statement.
>maybe you should give it a rest, find the old thread in question, try to follow it, and then see what I just saw right away.
Oh, so now we switch the topic again and now you want me to find you some shitty thread posted months/years ago? Good one, how about you be the little codemonkey you're and do it for us.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:36
>>54
The person that posted that code is clueless. The fact that he was trying to make himself look smart makes him that much dumber. Now go away. You're not only dumb, but you're also boring. And yes, that's bad. Hell, even the clueless computer science major who is dumber than a box a rocks is more interesting that you.
Nice job homer. You're below average!
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:40
>>55
Seeing as how you have a mental capacity of a baby, and can only argue by spouting out ad hominems like no other, I can see there's little hope with discussing anything with an ignorant dense pleb such as yourself.
Go off, enjoy your life as a codemonkey sheep. Enjoy thinking you're special when in fact you're not.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:44
>>56
You're just mad because you know that deep inside you will never amount to anything more than some tech support monkey.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:45
>>57
Keep the ad hominems flying kodak. Someday you might win the argument, oh wait....
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:54
>>58
And one day you might get a clue about programming. Oh wait...How not cute. You're hooching my one liners again.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:57
>>59
You think you own the rights to one liners like "Oh wait..." or "Someday you might win the argument"?
Thank you for further showing how big of a moron you truly are
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 19:59
>>60
No, but i like to claim that I have enough of a brain to come up with my own creative insults. Now go run off and molest another cow.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:06
>>61
Yes, because you're the only one that is allowed to use stock insults.
Please, get a life and grow up kid. Come back when you're mature enough to be on a textboard and act properly.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:09
>>62
As opposed to repeating what you see? Now again, you still haven't told us what you do for a living. Are you ashamed of your $18.25/hr general labor job?
says the man that sits on textboards all day calling people mental midgets and toilet scrubbers because he can't come up with a decent insult to save his life
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:15
>>64
Is that why you insist on stealing mine you moron?
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:17
>>65
Stealing? Ha... Please kodak-san, take the time to come up with better comebacks than just insisting i stole your words.
2 year olds can troll better than you can.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:22
>>66
I'm being honest you minimum wage idiot. I use some lame line, tnen like the dumb faggot you are, you use the same damn thing 4 posts later. Now again you mental midget, what do you do for a living?
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:26
>>67
Again, there you go with the baseless ad hominems.
It amazes me how trolls can be such failures when it comes to arguments.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:27
>>68
You still aren't answering my question. Given your lame technical responses, I'm going to say that you don't work any kind of programming job.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:29
>>69
Must I work as a code monkey in order to point out how big of a troll and failure you're?
Damn man, i feel so shitty now that i'm not some code monkey making 40k/yr workign 100 hours + a week.
Boy did i luck out.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:31
>>70
No. But don't get your panties in a bundle when I point out a programmer error that only a programmer would know about. Now shut up and try to learn something you damn idiot.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:36
>>71
I already pointed out what one of the original problems of that code was posts ago. How about you take the time to actually read the posts instead of spewing out more ad hominems to sound like an edgy fuck that thinks he's a know it all
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:42
>>72
Uhh....a missing return statement doesn't really constitute an error. I know this might sound kind of shocking, but something like a MS compiler would accept main() without a missing return statement. Yes, it's kind of idiotic, but the point is, a missing return statemet in main() doesn't scream "ERROR". But again, I wouldn't have expect your monkey ass to know something like this.
Now back to my point. There is a really subtle error in puts().
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:49
>>73
So you're claiming a function that should have a return statement, but doesn't is okay just because certain compilers will fix your shitty mistakes?
Good one.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 20:53
>>74
You've never written a single line of code have you? Anyways, there is an error in that code that, no matter how shitty the compiler is, won't catch. The fact that you don't see it is okay. The fact that you keep arguing with me just implies you are some boneheaded fag that refuses to learn something.
Now shut up and tell me what the error is you mental midget you.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:00
>>75
Aww yes, deal lord i don't find subtle C undefined behavior.
Good lord, you don't know C? You must not know shit. so edgy look at me stylin on you xD
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:02
>>76
I'm not that one that said 'return' was the error. You did. And the fact you stood by that lame assertion until I pointed out that some shitty compiler would still accept that construct means that you don't know the language. So not only are you stupid, but it now looks like you're projecting.
Now perhaps you should stop getting your panties in a bundle, find the old thread that discusses a similar problem, and then tell me what the error is you fucking moron.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:05
>>77 I'm not that one that said 'return' was the error.
I said it was ONE of the errors. Please if you're going to quote my previous posts then quote them correctly.
The fact that a shitty compiler accepts it doesn't make it any betters. GCC will accept compile functions with no return when they should have one as well.
You shouldn't be proud about how your shitty mistake will work with shitty compilers.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:07
>>78
But it's not THE error. Stop using caps to stress your stupidity you fuckng non programmer you and tell me the real error you fucking mental midget.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:09
>>78
And I didn't write that code you fucking idiot. Man you are one stupid SOB.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:10
2012
undefined behaviour
toy program
flame war: 32 posts
Oh kids, you're funny.
The fact that you also think programmers can not be programmers without knowing C or all of it's shitty undefined behavior just makes you look even worse.
You're a troll that can do nothing but switch to the nearest topic that you think you have a chance to win in because you know your shitty ad hominems get you no where in a real argument. So instead you'll find another thing to nitpick at and claim is wrong just to further yourself in an argument that has gone so far off topic from the OP that it's ridiculous
your shit posting is annoying, you're a bad troll that can't function in normal society.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:13
>>81
This mental midget, who clearly doesn't have the mental capacity to be a programmer, is not only dumb, but also annoying.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:13
>>80
Quick! to the ad hominems! maybe that'll win you the argument, oh wait, it won't.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:14
>>81
Leave it to a tripfag to shitpost for 16 straight posts about undefined behavior in a toy program.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:18
>>85
You, along with that idiot >>84 still don't see it do ya? Man you are a shitty excuse for a wanna be programmer. I think the both of you need to take up something a tad bit easier. Say like golf. Because it's pretty clear that programming is either one of you foolholios thing.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:19
#include <stdio.h>
int fac(int n)
{
int *p = &n;
--p;
*p = 0;
}
int main(int argc,char *argv[]) {
printf("check out my undefined behavior levels %d\n",fac(0));
}
You codemonkeys think you're in some kind of special club?
hahahah, enjoy being replaced by some 10 year old in India that's 10 times smarter than you.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:21
It's not even undefined behavior! 5.1.2.2.3 Program termination 1 If the return type of the main function is a type compatible with int, a return from the initial call to the main function is equivalent to calling the exit function with the value returned by the main function as its argument;10) reaching the } that terminates the main function returns a value of 0. If the return type is not compatible with int, the termination status returned to the host environment is unspecified.
Look at this part: reaching the } that terminates the main function returns a value of 0.
Also the line break in the string literal is caused by word wrapping on the text board, not a newline.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:22
>>88
It's not my fault you got shafted in the IQ department.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:23
>>89 Also the line break in the string literal is caused by word wrapping on the text board, not a newline.
It's not word wrapped on my screen.
What are you, some kind of peasant with 800x600 CRT still?
>>93
Huh? I'm not the one looking like the uneducated idiot in this thread. Perhaps you should give 4chan a rest, and go play WOW. I would give it a rest and write some code, but like, you've clearly demonstrated that you're challenged by the most basic programs.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:31
>>95
There you go again with the baseless ad hominems kodak. Not only that but you once again seem to think Programming <=> C, and on top of that, that it's some hard magical powers that only an intelligent1 such as yourself would understand.
[m]
1. mental midget [m]
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:34
>>96
This only just one thread. What about you uneducated and idiotic statements on other topics? And in other threads? Man, I swear, your mom must have dropped you on your head as a baby.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-20 21:39
>>97
Now you're trying to switch the topic again and try and break into other things?
I don't see where you're going with this Kodak, other than a desire to shitpost in more threads to derail them permanently with your shitposting bullshit.
>>100
Oh Great Dubs Lord, /prog/ shitposting skills are increasing.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:02
>>98
You don't see a lot of things. This is why you are a nowhere bitch. Now shut the fuck up and go scrub another toilet.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:08
>>102
Oh look, more ad hominems from kodak in an attempt to win the argument still.
It's funny how such a failure of a troll you're that you can only sit there and resort to cheap ad hominems
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:30
>>103
You just can't accept that fact that you suck dick as a programmer. Go take up something that requires a little less mental power. Like say, scrubbing a toilet.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:30
>>104
hahaha oh god your joke is so funny I can't stop farting
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:41
>>105
Eh? Tell me again you can't locate the error. Tell me again why you thought 'return' was an error. Tell me again why you don't work as a programmer. Tell me again why are still a virgin.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:42
>>104
man I should make a bot that just sits on /prog/ all day and responds to your shitty ad hominems.
What bothers me the most is that you claim to be some professional enterprise java programmer yet all you do is sit on /prog/ spouting ad hominems all day long. Sounds like someone is lying.
>>105
Now continue to look for the error you mental midget. I still don't think you see it, because like, well, you are a dumbass. Now fire back with another snide comment instead of trying to learn something you fucking dumb nigger.
>>108 >>106
Oh look Kodak once again samefagging in order to sound right.
Now fire back with another snide comment
says the king of ad hominems.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:48
>>107
You don't have the IQ to do something like that. The best you dumbass could do is either ask someone here for a bot and then modify to fit your needs. Because, again, for the millionth time, you are way too fucking stupid to write code.
Programming is so hard xD You can't find a simple undefined behavior in some toy C program XD you have no hope at programming.
Don't mind me just being a enterprise codemonkey with my a,b,c's java programming job
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:49
>>109
Maybe, but at the end of they you are still a dumbass who works a general labor job.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:52
>>111
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int number_of_times_kodak_uses_an_ad_hominem;
printf("You guys are all toilet scrubbers, i've been reminding you this for %d times now. When will you get it that you guys are scrubs and will never be part of the elitist club?",number_of_times_kodak_uses_an_ad_hominem);
}
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 11:53
>>112
I'm willing to bet you can't write an autotroller without the aid of google. I'm even going to take this one step further and say you don't even have the skill level to write a working one on your own in less than 30 minutes. Because again, you are kind of slow. Now shut up and go scrub another toilet.
>>116
I'm being serious. You say programming is easy. I bet you have zero clue how to write an autotroller. The best your slow ass could do is take some pre-existing code that someone else has written, and then modify it to fit your needs.
>>117
leave it to kodak to fail to spot the subtle troll
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 12:01
>>120
I'm just pointing out that you aren't skilled on any level. How is that being childisht you fucking moron? Man, I swear, most farm hicks aren't even as dumb as you.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 12:02
>>122
oh look more ad hominems from the child who can't argue without spouting off insults like a immature baby
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 12:06
Daily Reminder that kodak_gallery_programmer!!kCq+A64Losi56ze no longer has a job since kodak gallery went bankrupt.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 12:06
>>123
That's right, keep calling me a child in order to avoid the truth that you aren't a skilled programmer. Because you know that deep down inside you don't have what it takes to write an autotroller on your own without modifying someone elses code.
>>39
I work for Google, we laughed our asses off when someone recommended Apache for a project. It's completely unfit for production.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 13:18
Hey Kodak, this is your bi-monthly reminder that any subset of a countable set is also countable. Keep trying to pass Math 101 you fucking retard, you'll be able to define a subset if you practice a lot I'm sure.
>>117
It won't if the implementation is a conforming C implementation, stdout gets flushed at termination, and termination occurs right after the call to puts has finished.
>>140 Nothing, isn't that awesome? Staying all day and night jailed in your awesome confortable rad G+hole? Thank you! I have different objectives for life, like, really living?
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 14:25
>>141
In this case, the code may or may not call fflush(). If it doesn't call fflush(), the behavior is undefined. Now shut up you dumbass.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 14:28
>>141
Now given that fact that you're kind of dumb, I really don't expect you to actually understand the passages. I mean fuck, I bet you got C's and B's in your classes when attending your hick school. And you know why this is? Because you have a low IQ. Now do you really expect that you could magically understand something that is more difficult? Exactly. Now fuck off you no talent bitch.
Name:
Anonymous2012-02-21 14:37
Hey Kodak-kun, I just got out of my Computer hardware and assembly lecture.