/prog/ - Explain to me why C++ is better than C

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 20:22

Come on, do it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 20:34

It's fully compliant with Enterprise architecture©

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 20:41

OP here! Please kill me; it hurts to live!

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 20:58

- Object oriented programming; programming is so much more natural and easier to maintain with OOP, even though it can be overdone. Easier to avoid spaghetti Code.

- Works seamlessly with a number of popular APIs, libraries, toolkits...

- Backwards compatibility (for the most part) with C

- Multiple inheritance

- Stronger typing than C

- Just as performant as C

- Templates and STL

Would you like me to go on?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 22:08

>>4
1/10

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 23:46

>Easier to avoid spaghetti Code.

Not sucking helps too.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 0:01

sure smells like samefag in here.

inb4 back to /b/

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 3:13

>>7

really? my bbs text to smell generator is only producing vanilla caramel.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 4:04

It isn't.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 4:47

That's simple:
C++ is better than C, because it is a superset of C.

Q.E.D.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 5:37

>Let C = n
C++ = n + 1
n + 1 > n
C++ > C
QED

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 6:17

>>11
let c = 0
cplusplus = c++
cplusplus < c

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:29

>>12
let c = 0
cplusplus = c++
cplusplus < c

Let's step through this, shall we?

c = 0
// Store the value of c in
// cplusplus, then increment it
cplusplus = c++
cplusplus > c // Returns false
// The correct answer is c > cplusplus

You just proved that you're not fit to program in C++ OR C.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:40

#include <stdio.h>



int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {

    int c;

    int cpp;

    

    c = 0;

    cpp = c++;

    printf("And a winnar is... %s!\n", c > cpp ? "C" : "C++");

}

% cc cvcpp.c % ./a.out And the winnar is... C!

Name: 12 2012-02-09 8:45

>>13
see >>14

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:46

And that means you're not fit to program in C++ OR C.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:47

the result of C++ > C is undefined

however in the real world it is implementation defined to be 0, since C++ is complete shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:52

>>17
Ok, could you look less dumb, please?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:54

>>18
I reviewed >>17 and found nothing wrong, what are you complaining about exactly?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:59

>>19
Nothing, it was towards you attitude.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 9:21

>>20
>>18
Go back to /g/with if that is how you are going to act in an arguement faggot

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 9:26

>>17
What about C / C++?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 9:27

>>20
I haven't posted in this thread before >>19 so I don't exactly see what's wrong with my attitude.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 10:23

>>17
Not C, C++ neither.

>>21
Ok...

>>23
I'm an mental midget enterprise bbcoder, so, ignore it for your own sake.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 12:03

>>22
Also undefined; there's no way to tell which part of the operation is going to evaluate first.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 14:23

ITT it demonstrates that only angry men use C++.
COMPUTER SCIENCE has yet to confirm
if C++ made them angry,
or C++ have properties that appeal to angry men.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 17:05

I use C++ and I'm not angry. I also use lisp, but I have not achieved satori.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 17:12

Expert C++ programmers are closet angry men.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 18:46

>>1-28
http://vocaroo.com/i/s00VPqgOpNHA

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 23:11

>>29

fuck off euroshit

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-11 3:25

>>30
implying I'm yuropean

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-11 5:14

>>29
slash bee slash

what's \b\?

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-11 6:57

>>30
This is what you really believe.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-11 13:02

>>29
I enjoyed this post.

Explain to me why C++ is better than C

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 20:22

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 20:34

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 20:41

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 20:58

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 22:08

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-08 23:46

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 0:01

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 3:13

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 4:04

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 4:47

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 5:37

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 6:17

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:29

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:40

15 Name: 12 2012-02-09 8:45

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:46

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:47

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:52

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:54

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 8:59

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 9:21

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 9:26

23 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 9:27

24 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 10:23

25 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 12:03

26 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 14:23

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 17:05

28 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 17:12

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 18:46

30 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-09 23:11

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-11 3:25

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-11 5:14

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-11 6:57

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-11 13:02