Soon US Dollar will go default...

...but you wont lose anything, cause you're a poorfag! even your stupid life costs nothing. deal with it.

>>1
this is what happens when you spin the rotary press too many times, we must reverse it

>>1
[citation needed]

>>3
just looks around you
look beyond

>>2
good luck, loser.

>>4
I'm doing quite well here. What about you?

>>6
just got my student refund, so pretty well until I graduate

>>7
What school?

>>8
conestoga elementary

Be assured that this will happen to everyone's surprise, except for the leaders of this process. Till the end the dollar will be strong, everything will be nice. Then one day, everything turns into dust. As a wise man said: "Today for a dollar people give you 27 rubles, but soon they will give you in the face." At the same time will collapse the euro, the ruble, etc. Although none of these currencies will default, as the dollar, but because of the enormous hole in global finance instantly fall in the price at 10-15 times. When almost all money are gone, then the slow construction of a new world economic system will begin. Key positions are those who own the most profitable assets (real company, etc.). They are the fastest who will earn the most new money. The rest will hopelessly fall behind.

>>1
This is funny man, when dumb people think they've got something.

>>1-san, listen.
(Or just skip the below shit entirely, I don't care if you don't read)
There are companies out there who own the world, not you, not me, not anyone on this board.
They need just money, but money is just paper. The money they want comes from just two things: natural resources, and scientific development.
So these companies manipulate governments, raising great infrastructure to cities, where you, me, your father, your teacher, and everyone will work for their ideals. This way the countryside is completely theirs.
Now they do marketing about unuseful shit like cosmetics, fast food, video games, computers and an utterly load of shit that people don't need, shit that makes people lazy and dumb. Shit that makes you think you've got something. Poor people exist just to lure you to stay in your jail. “Oh, there's people much poorer than I, so I'm gifted, I deserve it.” Bullshit. You are feed with lies, believe in them, but you're the first and most abused victim of this system.
People are taught to stay alone, to compete with others, to pursue unuseful social status and privileges, which is totally crappy bullshit. You are still the same uncreative, ridiculous, and braindead asshole. But marketing propaganda makes you feel “like a boss”, because you can be a good engineer, medic, technician or whatever the fuck companies need. The whole pop culture support this, the whole 4-chan memeshit support this, YOUR whole family, friends AND company support this.

I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS, YOU ARE SHIT, YOU ALL ARE SHIT, I AM SHIT, MY FRIENDS ARE SHIT, THIS WORLD ARE SHIT.

Until you met people totally uncompromised with these lies, people that stare at the worst and harsh realities and prefer to fight them, not just fight, they leave everything and truly live as a “shitty poor underdeveloped country suburban nigga“. And they are the ones who GOT SOMETHING FOR REAL.

>>11
Cool story bro. Tell me another one.

>>1 YO IM DA RISTA KAT DA DEMA CAT N ...

PITBOOL ROCKZ DA HOOS I GOT RAT N NIGGA N MONEY

>>13
when dollar will collapse, niggers will fucking starve or turn into cannibals. hope you own a gun.

I have a O(1) gold making algorithm so I should be fine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC19fEqR5bA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC19fEqR5bA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC19fEqR5bA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC19fEqR5bA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC19fEqR5bA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC19fEqR5bA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC19fEqR5bA

2012 is the year.

ron paul 2020!

>>15
Gold is just a rare metal with some use in electronics. If you find a cheap way to produce gold, it will lose most of it's price. But kudos to you, cause you will make computation cheaper.

>>18
Ah but what if you keep the process secret and just release the gold onto the market slowly

>>19
then you get rich at the rate of a negative exponential

>>20
Then some Rothschilds will liquidate him and privatise his wealth. Sad but trure - there could be only one master.

Dubs

I wonder if we could make dubz the currency of the future.

>>23
A poor mans bit coin

>>24
know of any good bit coin miners?

>>25
Communism with direct democracy. People won't get anywhere, without altruism and cooperation with each other. Ignore fucking political parties - ally yourself with your friends and neighbors, then help others to do the same. No god, king or capitalist will save us, if we aren't for each other.

Get into a rock-solid Zimbabwe Investment Pyramid before the US economy crashes!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHjjUZugFCE

>>27
I would have purchased some food, that could be stored for a LONG time (years). You know, during the great depression, russian revolution and WW2, the first to die were those who had not enough food or nowhere to hide it.

If you hold gold, you're also in danger. For example, one of the reasons for Ukrainian Famine, was a way to extract gold, hidden by population, selling them food for a very high price.

The then state of affairs in the US society can be seen in Peter Jackson’s movie King Kong. The movie starts with scenes of the Great Depression and tells the story of an actress who did not eat for three days and tried to steal an apple from a street vendor. There is food in the city, but many people had no money to buy it in unemployment-paralyzed New York. People starve in the streets against the background of stores selling a variety of foodstuffs.

At the same time, the US government tried to get rid of redundant foodstuffs, which vendors could not sell. Market rules were observed strictly: unsold goods should always be categorized as redundant and they could not be given away to the poor because it could cause damage to businesses. A variety of methods was used to destroy redundant food. They burnt crops, drowned them in the ocean or plowed 10 million hectares of harvesting fields. “About 6.5 million pigs were killed at that time,” the researcher wrote.

The consequences of those policies were predictable, the author of the article wrote. “Here is what a child recollected about those years: “We changed our usual food for something for available. We used to eat bush leaves instead of cabbage. We ate frogs too. My mother and my older sister died during a year.” (Jack Griffin).”

>>29
During the Great Depression, formerly wealthy executives stood in line for hours waiting in ragged clothes for a hand-out of hot soup, while the rural "poor" went about life as usual, barely noticing the Depression. Survivors of the Depression who lived in agrarian regions often joked that they were "too poor to notice the stock market crash", but they were, in fact, better off than the majority of inner-city workers in that they never went hungry. As a result of this, the one-half of Americans with access to their own home-grown foods were exempt from the horrors of the Great Depression.

Now imagine that, instead of 50% of the population suffering from the woes of an economic collapse, it was the 99.2% who are not involved in agriculture full-time. The comparison makes 1929 look like a walk in the park. Worse still, our food transporation services are now fully dependent on massive amounts of petroleum for transport, and the distances of food transporation have increased from tens of miles to thousands, which makes the modern grocery network look even more fragile by comparison.

>>26,30
Communitarianism is the key to not rely on market. But capitalist propaganda against communism was so strong that I don't think people will try it anyway.

>>31
Most people have no idea what they mean when they say the words communism or capitalism. Capitalism isn't evil and neither is communism. Having an unjust control over other people is evil. Cooperating with your community in a community garden is just plain common sense.

>>1-1000
Not programming. Back to /b/ please.

>>32
True, since all economy is just people's work, capitalism could just work if bosses weren't cold-hearted monsters manipulating governments, exploring workers and using poverty as propaganda.

Do you believe that one can achieve “success” by advancing industry (through technology or science)? What's your definition of “success”?

>>33
I really don't care, sorry.
In my opinion, this discussion is more useful and interesting than spamming memes, troll questions or bad jokes.

>>34
My definition of success is communities helping one another and living with respect to the land. A capitalist who lives to control more money and power is not a sustainable way of life for the whole of a society. I condone the advance of the state of art through capitalism when the players involved assume responsibility for their actions (both positive and negative) on society and the environment.

I wish everybody could be intelligent and caring enough to want to care for each other, but the fact is that too many people are self-serving, myopic and ignorant to see the bigger picture beyond the upcoming week of self-servitude.

at the end of the series of case: statements which are economics, I can guarantee you that default: americanCapitalism is not at the end

>>32
Capitalism isn't evil
Capitalism is just a variation of monarchy, bacause it proposes single/family/clan-ownership, which is exploitation. There is no way from to stop capitalism from becoming one global monopoly.

That is why we can now point to people, like Rothschilds, and say that they are the enemies of humanity.

>>34
Communism could just work if it didn't require a brutal dictatorship to implement.  And if most people weren't lazy and selfish enough to always expect someone else to do the hard work.  And if the people who do work didn't have their souls crushed by the fruits of their labor being taken away year after year to build another wing on the palace aid a distant place they've never heard of.  And if logistical problems could be solved by central planning half as efficiently as the free market does.

>>38
Communism could just work if it didn't require a brutal dictatorship to implement.
Dictatorship isn't communism, it just a form of monarchy (what you will get when some capitalist attains absolute monopoly). To implement real communism, you need http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy where every member of community participates.

And if most people weren't lazy and selfish enough to always expect someone else to do the hard work.
That is why people should cooperate to expel lazy bastards or find them a job.

And if logistical problems could be solved by central planning half as efficiently as the free market does.
It could be solved by global cooperation between communities.

With capitalism we have something unbelievable and purely wrong. For example, gypsies sold drugs to kids of the community. Parents cooperated (because police is corrupt and works for whomever pays more), lynching some gypsies and expelling the rest. But what does the government do? It punish community for violating "human rights" of the drug dealers! Community cant even decide whom it wants as neighbors!

>>37
Capitalism just says people start businesses based upon the potential to derive a profit by offering a product or service. This would also include the ability to hire people to do jobs for the business owner.

monarchy, bacause it proposes single/family/clan-ownership, which is exploitation.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.

There is no way from to stop capitalism from becoming one global monopoly.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.

That is why we can now point to people, like Rothschilds, and say that they are the enemies of humanity.
Rothschilds are enemies of humanity because they assert an unjust influence over humanity, not because because they control the banking system. Controlling a ubiquitous banking system is not evil in itself, it's the actions and intents together that show how evil you are.

>>41
Capitalism just says people start businesses based upon the potential to derive a profit by offering a product or service. This would also include the ability to hire people to do jobs for the business owner.
Yep! Capitalism says that drug dealers can start their business in your school, selling drugs to your children and you cant do a fuck about it. Capitalism also says that Microsoft can force Windows into schools and you should be happy.

>>41
Rothschilds are enemies of humanity because they assert an unjust influence over humanity, not because because they control the banking system.
1. they don't control banking, they control everything, like a fucking King.
2. the emergence of "Rothschilds" is inevitable with captialism - if you lynch them, the new family will born anyway. The only solution is to admit that capitalism is not the Right Thing.

>>42
Yep! Capitalism says that drug dealers can start their business in your school, selling drugs to your children and you cant do a fuck about it.
Are you implying that there are other forms of socio-economic structures that will prevent this hypothetical from occurring?

Capitalism also says that Microsoft can force Windows into schools and you should be happy.
Microsoft doesn't force Windows into schools. Schools actually choose to use Microsoft's software. When they don't choose to use Microsoft, Microsoft will offer ways to make their offering more attractive. That sounds like free mark

>>43
1. they don't control banking, they control everything, like a fucking King.
Care to cite anything?
2. the emergence of "Rothschilds" is inevitable with captialism - if you lynch them, the new family will born anyway. The only solution is to admit that capitalism is not the Right Thing.
I don't understand how capitalism inevitably results in a Rothschild level bourgeois. I see such an event happening in any socio-economic structure.

>>44
Microsoft doesn't force Windows into schools. Schools actually choose to use Microsoft's software.
Stop being naive. Schools don't choose anything. The managers are the ones who choose, and the managers have nothing to do with you, they work for those who pays them - capitalists. Private schools are even simpler - they can almost openly be a a part of global monopoly (or through a shell companies), without invoking corruption charges.

Microsoft will offer ways to make their offering more attractive. That sounds like free mark
Yep! Drug dealers give the first dose for free.

Care to cite anything?
For example, they control even a good share of Russia:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20031102-111400-3720r.htm

I don't understand how capitalism inevitably results in a Rothschild level bourgeois.
The same way as Microsoft killed all its competitors. Or as Coca-Cola did.

I see such an event happening in any socio-economic structure.
Only where real people (like you and me) are excluded from decision making, even at the level of their community.

>>45
And, BTW, you wont find Rothschilds on Forbes billionaries list. Guess why.

>>46
Because they're Jews?

public static JEWS main

>>47
Wrong. Persons on Forbes list are jews. Rothschilds just aren't billionaries, neither they are millionaries.