>>28
While not universally true, the vast majority of feminists only fight for the rights of women. It is understandable due to the origin of the movement, as is the name, but it was not anything so sophisticated as being anti-machism. Perhaps some streams could become it, but the whole movement started with getting voting rights.
True anti-machism would also inevitably be socialism, fighting for the rights of all of the opressed equally. As even men are opressed by the patriarchy and the mighty few who sit upon the throne, true 'feminism' would not focus on women. True anti-machism would do everything proper feminists do and more. You cannot have the cake and eat it too. You are not feminist if you do not focus on women, and you are not anti-machist if you do focus on one group above the others.
I consider myself a socialist (and as a result a feminist), but it is usually something I shamefuly admit due to the many madmen that have come to take on the banner of these movements. The main problem I have with many feminist groups is the them-versus-us mindset, the belief that the patriarchy is some grand design from up above instead of emergent phenomena, and ultimately the vindictiveness some show in trying to reach equality. Calling out someone for being a jerk and then, in their own meetings, recreating the exact same privilege but in reverse to 'balance things out' always gets my blood boiling. The absolutely worst cases are those meetings where there is an actual queue of speakers where black women get to speak first and white males speak last.