THE STANDARD
1
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 3:57
Where can i get a copy of THE STANDARD?
Specifically, C89, C99, C++98, C++03 and C++11.
Preferably as a pirated PDF but a cheap annotated physical copy is also appreciated
2
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 4:30
tpb
3
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 4:37
4
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 5:28
For completeness the C standards are:
C89:
http://flash-gordon.me.uk/ansi.c.txt
C99:
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
C11:
http://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf
With the exception of C89, these are the latest available drafts provided prior to publication.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 5:46
I can provide a copy of the C++11 FDIS, I got it from one of the committee members, one sec.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 5:52
7
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 8:13
8
Name:
Sensei
2012-01-24 13:00
>>3
Why help clueless assholes by being a middle man between them and a search engine?
As if someone who can't use Google will fucking understand an ISO programming language standard anyway.
http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/
9
Name:
kodak_gallery_programmer
!!kCq+A64Losi56ze
2012-01-24 13:18
I don't know about anyone else here, but I'm a big fan of standards. This is because if I have to port a piece of code from Linux to Windows, I should be spending all my time working on/modifying the system specific portions of the program. Me having to also go and modify the so called portable parts of the program is just an utter waste of time because I'm forced to learn about parts of the program that I shouldn't have to learn about.
10
Name:
kodak_gallery_programmer
!!kCq+A64Losi56ze
2012-01-24 13:21
And while this might not matter for your toy program, it does matter for programs that span over 1.3 million lines of code. I, nor anyone else, has the time to go read and study the so called portable parts of the program.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 13:38
>>9-10
read sicp or get out
12
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 14:00
>>8
>To partially answer my own question
>my own question
>...
>Why help clueless assholes by being a middle man between them and a search engine?
13
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 14:02
>>12
BBCODE FAILURE
also check my primes
14
Name:
kodak_gallery_programmer
!!kCq+A64Losi56ze
2012-01-24 15:31
>>11
I've already read the titty book.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 15:37
>>14
You're a java programmer, fuck off.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 15:42
>>15
Go scrub another midget.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 15:43
18
Name:
microsoft_cloud_programmer
!!QSvwrQMMkoH22b4
2012-01-24 15:44
>>16
no, fuck off. You wanna know the truth? I work at microsoft. Yeah that's right, FUCKING MICROSOFT. I work on their cloud software because unlike you I'm not a fucking toilet scrubber.
19
Name:
ibm_toilet_scrubber
!VobhuDz8I6
2012-01-24 15:48
>>18
Shut your damn mouth! Someone has to scrub the toilets or do you wanna use toilets that run over from shit?
20
Name:
kodak_gallery_programmer
!!kCq+A64Losi56ze
2012-01-24 16:00
I just find it funny how you all kind of went silent went I pointed out that the % operator in Java wasn't modulo.
21
Name:
microsoft_cloud_programmer
!!QSvwrQMMkoH22b4
2012-01-24 16:03
>>20
I don't even know what post you're referring to nor do I use java so I don't care.
22
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 17:15
<< STANDARD DUBS
23
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 18:40
STANDARIZE MY ANUS
24
Name:
Oracle_toilet_scrubber
!!+32RHIEn9IDK9J6
2012-01-24 19:16
>>19
You've got no future as a toilet scrubber. Now move along and go draw another UML chart, you mental midget.
25
Name:
Anonymous
2012-01-24 22:50
None of the interesting parts of programs are covered by standards.