Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 9:24

If Chrome will include a Dart VM, will other browsers follow? If other browsers follow, how long until we finally have to stop taking the abortion that is javascript into account? (http://try-dart-lang.appspot.com/)

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 9:27

no.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 9:39

I wish they'd just standardize a Bytecode-VM like LLVM, Java, whatever. Then everybody could code in whatever language they want and compile it to common object code, instead of cooking up plugin after plugin for the ill though out flavor of the month lang.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 9:40

'>running a close source program through your web browser
>2012

yeah

Name: TEN YEARS FROM NOW 2012-01-21 10:11

If X will include a Y VM, will other browsers follow? If other browsers follow, how long until we finally have to stop taking the abortion that is dart into account? (http://try-x-lang.appspot.com/)

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 10:25

If Chrome will include a Dart VM, will other browsers follow?

IE: no. reason: MSFT hates GOOG

FF: no. reason: The Eich loves his javascript and will not willingly let another usurp it.

Safari & Opera: maybe.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 13:14

>>3 is the only reasonable thing to do, except designing the perfect WebVM is non-trivial.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 13:23

>>3
This should be done. In fact, this is an idea I've been working on personally for a while, and j have just under a kloc of concept source code. But that's not enough, it needs to be standardized and every feature and aspect of its behaviour must be agreed upon by 100% of the group working on it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 13:37

God damnit Google, all your languages are nothing that's not already out there. Imperative, oo, Java/c++ clones with benefits. I sincerely expected more.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 13:42

>>9

maybe they are trying to get more popular with the hipster code monkeys. Doing the same paradigm in a new cutting edge language, yeah!

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 13:59

>>6
Safari: no. Reason: AAPL hates GOOG
Opera: maybe

Name: kodak_gallery_programmer !!kCq+A64Losi56ze 2012-01-21 14:02

>>11
Have you seen the new Safari cookie format? It's truely the most brain damaged thing I've ever seen in my entire life. The cookie format has *both* little endian and big endian.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 14:06

>>6,11
Google are pretty dumb if they think someone are going to implement their inventions elsewhere.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 14:06

Opera: maybe
Why bother, when Google will somehow make it go ``Your browser is Opera, even though it works we disable the functionality, also download Chrome...''

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 16:10

>>14
THIS
Google search is nice but it's power is starting to go to their heads and they're doing too much.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 16:24

>>15
Google is the Yamakan of computing.
``I'm here to save computing!'', then we've got infinite problems.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 16:57

If IE 3.0 will include a VBScript interpreter, will other browsers follow? If other browsers follow, how long until we finally have to stop taking the abortion that is javascript into account?
15 years later...no other browsers support VBScript unless they use IE's rendering engine.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 17:03

>>16
Larry Page moves all operations to Israel, now we have Jew problems.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 17:04

>>17
Except VBScript was an even worse plague than JS. At least Dart gets something right.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-21 18:51

VBScript was a Lisp of its time, Lisp dominated AI, the other dominated the fuck-up-the-computer-through-the-browser niche.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List