>>8
Okay, here is the plan, one person posts something mathematical, then we wait for him to respond, then we post a link to his post on /sci/, naturally they will start debating there and possibly here, we then delete the post on /sci/ so that the debaters must debate it here, together with jobless_programmer.
>>9
/sci/ the textboard, or /sci/ the imageboard? The first is too slow to keep him busy, the second is an imageboard, some of them would leak into /prog/.
We can try, though.
Name:
Anonymous2012-01-10 21:31
I like the kodak guy. You guys seem upset because he proved you wrong in that C argument on pointers
Name:
Anonymous2012-01-10 22:43
I don't even know what this thread is about, but if it ain't Lisp, it's crap.
Name:
Anonymous2012-01-10 23:27
>>12
This one: http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1320800146 right ?
I still remember that. I'm the noob teenager programmer who got flamed because I said that char* was a "string of characters", while in fact it is only considered a string when it is null-terminated:
That is incorrect you fucking nigger. Again, for the second time, C doesn't have a string of characters. Instead, what C has are an array of characters. If this array of characters is terminated with '\0', then it becomes a string.
I guess I learnt my lesson there.
Name:
Anonymous2012-01-10 23:31
>>14
if anyone was wondering, I did know about C null-termination and strings, but I didn't know the right terminology. (I pretty much thought one could say "string" to mean "array". When you look at the non-CS-context definition of the two, they are semantically close. I agree, however, and following this flame, that in the context of programming and computer science, they are not the same).
Name:
14,15-san2012-01-10 23:38
carrying on from 14,15 --
It's worth noting that I'm the one who actually fixed OP's code that time. Good night /pork/, and may you be less shitty in the future.