/prog/ - Racket has no JIT

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 4:34

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.racket.devel/915
`ptr-ref' and `ptr-set!' operations are slow. They are slow because they not yet inlined by the JIT

no interactive video games for you.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:45

Lisp is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:52

Why would anyone sane use racket over Common Lisp?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:54

>>3
cleaner api, continuation, environment, JIT.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:58

>>4
CL can compile to native code

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 10:03

>>5
CL is diarrhoea.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 10:03

good thing pypy exists then

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 6:45

>>5
But Racket does that automatically.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 9:57

>>8
Yeah, except Racket isn't compliant to any Scheme standard, thus rendering it shitty. And even if it was, it would be compliant with R6RS, which is terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 10:03

>>9

#!r5rs

#!r6rs

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 16:43

deck my choubles

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 17:57

>>6
Says someone who doesn't know CL, but that's okay, most Lisps are fine with me (except newLISP and some pretend-Lisps which only have S-Expressions in common with actual Lisps).

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 20:48

>>12
http://clipsrules.sourceforge.net/
What do you think of CLIPS?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 21:02

>>13
Having never used it, I can't have an opinion, but it looks rather specialized to expert systems, so it's not a general-purpose programming language (in the sense that you won't be using it for that, not in the sense that it's not turing-complete, which it might be).

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 21:07

>>11
Chice noubles

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:01

>>8
Why the fuck does it need JIT then?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:02

>>16
The automatically part is probably the JIT, you know.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:13

>>17
But the subject says Racket doesn't have JIT.

Also, not anime.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:19

>>18
Racket has JIT everywhere, except where you really need it (like where you processing a big array of 16-bit sound samples).

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:21

Racket also uses http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_lightning for JIT, which does not provide register allocation, data-flow, and control-flow analysis, or optimization.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:37

|∧,,∧
| ･ω･）＜ Next post is dubs!
|⊂ノ

|
|彡 *fwish*
|

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 23:10

check em

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 10:40

　　　 __,ﾍ_ ,. -──- ､,
　　　ri::::;ﾍ＞=＝=- ､　｀ヽ.
　邪　7〉'　,　 ,　ﾊ　､　｀ヽ　 ',
　魔　i i　/_!,/ｨ」 L､!_ﾊ_i　',　i
　な　 |_i__!ｲ'T,j　　'T_,T!_ﾊ! |　　　　それで満足したら
　ん　　 ! 7i"　　　　　",!l |　|　　　　　お帰り願えますか
　で.　　| i l＞.､.,_｀　_,,.イ! /l |　　　　　　__
　　　　ヽ!ヽﾍﾚくレ'／レ'ヽ!'　／〉　, '"´　　｀ヽ.
　　　　　　　/7}><{/:::/＾ヽ.くx'／　/　 ´・ ω・｀!
　　　　　 r〈/::::Y::::t::k'　_,.ｨ'×､> ,'　　　　　　 ,'　　　　　
　　　　　/ k:::::i：:::::::::i'´　!／　／　　　　　　, '
　　 .ヘ､/／::｀7::T:::￣! 　|､　,'　　　　　　／
　　　｀>'::::::::/:::::::::::::::::::!　 |::ヽ.　　 ,　'"´
　　 rくe::::::/::::::::::i:::::::::::し_ﾉ::e::>､'
　　ヽﾆヽ7ﾆ二ｨ_T__ﾊ_7イノｰ'´〈
　　　　　｀ゝ､_rﾝ＾ヽ､_r､,ﾉ　｀ヽi
　　　　　　,.ｲ--!　　　Y　i､
　　　　　（二'ン'　　〈'二_'〉
　　　　　　￣　　　　　￣

Racket has no JIT

1 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 4:34

2 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:45

3 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:52

4 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:54

5 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:58

6 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 10:03

7 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 10:03

8 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 6:45

9 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 9:57

10 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 10:03

11 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 16:43

12 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 17:57

13 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 20:48

14 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 21:02

15 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 21:07

16 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:01

17 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:02

18 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:13

19 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:19

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:21

21 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:37

22 Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 23:10

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 10:40

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 4:34

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:52

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:54

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 9:58

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 10:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 10:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 6:45

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 9:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 10:03

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 16:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 17:57

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 20:48

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 21:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 21:07

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:13

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:19

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:21

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 22:37

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-11 23:10

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 10:40