How lies about reading SICP?
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 0:38
Since we're all anonymous, let's be honest here. Who here tells people online to read SICP but hasn't read it themselves?
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 0:39
I've already read SICP.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 0:56
I read a little, and thought it kind of sucked =)
I guess that IS why prog likes it so much...
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 2:13
I stopped after fibs. I consider my education complete.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 2:43
>>4
Sounds like my HASKAL education right there.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 3:25
Still reading it, it's awesome.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 4:43
>>4
Seen the cover. I consider my education complete.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 6:33
It's actually quite enjoyable if you skip all those BOARING mathematics.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 7:11
I READ ALL OF IT
EVEN THE PART THE PROFESSOR DIDNT COVER
SICP IS MY LIEF
I CANT BELIEVE THEY WANT TO REWRITE IT IN PYTHON I THINK ITS A HOAX
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 9:16
I havent read SICP, but I have read OnLisp, it quickly recites most of the SICP content.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 9:17
>>10
How would you know it covers SICP content, if you haven't read SICP? Huh, tough guy?
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 9:25
>>11
I briefly listed through SICP, to see what it talks about.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 9:40
IVE READ SICP!!!
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 9:43
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 10:57
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 11:59
>>15
There is some way to do it.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 14:00
I watched through all the videos, and did super-basic shit with an interpreter or two.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 15:43
>>16
You are overestimating Shiichan.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 16:05
>>18
Am I misremembering? I swore I saw it before. Oh well.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 16:41
>>20
There is less than one way to do it.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-12-21 16:59
>>19
Maybe you read some of my delusions on how sweet would it be to have >>>
threadid/
post cross-thread post references.