>>12
But my logic explains and why some observers might think like you too.
Might be. I'll wait with a rock hard dick for the explanation why this supposed objective truth is like it is and not something else. Didn't they prove 1+1=2, as long as arithmetical addition is defined, but then they had trouble defining arithmetical addition? Because they were trying to find an "objective" arithmetical addition, which does not exist?
Oh, here is the link:
http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2006/06/extreme_math_1_1_2.php
And then, along came this obnoxious guy by the name of Kurt Gödel, who proceeded to show that it was all a big waste of time.
Kurt Gödel, what a great mind. He understands the shit that's going on here.