>>7
Lisp is turing-complete. So is C, C++, et al. Do you know what this means, dumbass? It means that it doesn't matter what language you use. You'll get the same results from any turing-complete language, you fucking moron.
You are not aware of this, but Touring-equivalence is proved by demonstrating that you can write an interpreter for one language in another, and vice-versa. So yes, you can do in C++ everything that you can do in Lisp, by writing a Lisp interpreter in C++. In this sense it doesn't matter which language you use, ha ha. Ha ha ha.