GNU

There isn't a single piece of GNU project software that is actually, objectively good. It's usually bloated, spec-deviant or bloody useless.

Examples: coreutils, autoconf

>>18
A good metric is whether it does what it's supposed to.
For instance, emacs is a text editor. Does it edit text? Yes. Does it need games, a Web browser, a Lisp interpreter, and god knows what else? No. Therefore, it is bloated.