Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Classical Composers

Name: audiophile 2011-11-16 0:01

Heil, /prog/!

Could you please recommend me talented composers, who are a must to listen.

I know and totally love Frideric Handel, Georgi Sviridov, Willam Walton and Vaughan Williams.

No pretentious jewish crap, please. Jews know nothing about harmony.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 0:17

Chopin didn't like jews

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/culture/damianthompson/100006942/chopin-the-anti-semite-not-a-fanatic-but-he-didnt-like-jews/

Nocturnes are good. Some are a little boring, but pretty to hear once in a while.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 0:21

>>2
Poor Chopin. Now jews will ban him, like they banned swastik - a symbol of Sun, then they'll ban the Sun itself for being "antisemitic".

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 0:25

niggers and kikes

Name: FrozenVoid !!mJCwdV5J0Xy2A21 2011-11-16 1:47

Franz List,Dvorak and Mozart. I have a Classical CD collection(it collects dusts though since i can download youtube stream of any concerts)

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 1:53

ZUN

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 7:15

Bach.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 7:29

狐の工作室

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 7:49

I'd say Wagner, but that's not for you JEWS.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 15:34

why would you ask about classical composers on /prog/ when you can /prog/ your own classical compositions

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 21:01

>>10
This. Someone should write a free software implementation of `MySong':
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/dan/mysong/

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 21:23

>>10
Composing music requires Strong AI (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_ai).

Of course you can take prior works and make patterns of them, but that wont be new, just randomized.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 21:26

Gustav Holst - Suite No. 1 for military band in E flat major:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hfde1QG7CFs

After Holst I think most video game music was ripped off from classics.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 22:38

>>12
I'm sure you could algorithmically write a `creative' composition. There are pretty much solid rules on what chord progressions do/don't work and so on.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 22:43

>>14
Computer has no idea what is "creative" or "good sounding". And these qualities cant be expressed without a complete human brain together with senses.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-16 23:02

>>15
Humans neither.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 0:25

My favorite composer is Gioacchino Rossini.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 1:13

>>15
Computers don't generate creative or good sounding music. Sentient programmers create algorithms that generate good sounding music.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 1:15

>>18
Do you have algorithm that generates these algorithms?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 2:56

>>15

You just have to define a function that ranks music. Then the AI can attempt to generate music that maximizes the ranking.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 3:15

>>20
How does it ranks? By comparing to prior works? Don't make me laugh, silly imbecile!

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 4:04

>>10

That would entail knowing a combination of more esoteric things, like music theory.

But, common practice harmony and species counter-point could possibly be constructed as rewrite rules. Then, maybe, like a reverse engineered Schenkerian analysis, could possibly generate tonal (classical) music from a 'seed' (Key, leitmotif, etc.).

If you are really interested, try this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_music

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 5:51

>>21
Why does a computer that compares musical works make you laugh?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 6:14

>>23
It's invented by by jews to take down videos from youtube, cause they sound like their property.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 6:26

>>22
Then, maybe, like a reverse engineered Schenkerian analysis, could possibly generate a whole collection of William Shakespeare's works from a 'seed' (Key, subject, etc.).

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 6:41

>>24
I have no idea why your response has anything to do with the ranking of musical works.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 6:50

>>26
That is because you're silly imbecile.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 6:57

>>27
What?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 8:58

>>25

Not what >>22 said. A recursive algorithm could generate (from rules) a text that resembles Shakespeare's, or any of his contemporaries, works, in the same way www.elsewhere.org/pomo/ generates pretentious "post-modern" text in the style of scholarly article. You pulled a particular out of the statement and is, perhaps, indicative of your mild retardation. Why would you want to generate any one of Shakespeare's works, anyways? They are already written down.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 10:31

Ke$ha
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -