/prog/ - >2011 — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 1:29

not using python exclusively
ISHYGDDT

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 1:32

class keyword

pffffff

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 2:05

>>2
autism
pfffffffffrrt

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 2:07

NYJMUA

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 2:23

I am angry at myself over the amount of hatred that I feel for this thread. It is unacceptable and I am never going to allow this to happen to me again.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 3:13

>>5
*grabs dick*

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 3:25

exclusively
What's wrong with writing parts of it (modules) in C?

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 3:52

I see the plebs are still shitting on C.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 4:02

>>8

`

>2011

>still answering troll threads and posts

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 5:56

>>-
To /g/, especially >>1,9.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 6:07

>>10

`

>2011

>sending people back to /g/

ISHYGDDT

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 6:16

>>11
Go back to /v/, then.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 13:08

>>7
because C is not Python

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 13:14

/prog/ is still an irredeemable shithole, I see. Back in another month.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 14:18

>>14
aaaaaannnnddddd yet another python basher

get back to your fagtastic toy languages like ruby and perl, ``faggot''

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 14:20

>>15
And you go back to reddit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 16:35

>>13
But Python and C can improve each other.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:13

>>17
except you're using something other than python

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:14

`

>2011

>using a non-turing-complete language

i seriously hope you guys don't, etc..

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:16

>>19
Go back to /g/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:58

>2011
>browsing /prog/ and not reddit
>mfw people still do this

ISHYGDDT

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:59

>>21
Go back to /g/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:01

>>22
>implying I don't have /g/ open in another tab
>2011

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:05

>>23
>2011
>can't quote on textboards

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:06

>>24

'

>bbcode

>2011

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:10

>>23-25
Go back to /g/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:24

>>26

suck my dick dude

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:29

>>26,27
No, suck my dick.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:42

If it is possible to compile languages such as C into Java byte codes, I see a great danger. The danger is that people will use Java byte codes to hook GCC up to proprietary back ends and proprietary front ends. They could also generate Java byte codes, run a proprietary optimizer, and feed the result back into GCC. In effect, the support for Java byte codes would undermine the goals of the GPL. If your changes really do make such activities much easier, more feasible in practice, then I think it would have been better if you had never implemented the feature. And now it would be better now if you take these changes off your web site, and don't mention that they exist. Of course, someone else really determined could redo the work, the extra burden of doing so might dissuade people from trying.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 19:15

Cool Free Anagrams
Lolicon Satan Cool Annalist Anal Colonist

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 20:36

>>30
Quality post.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-01 2:14

>>29
I lol'd, its probably more a Stallman/Gosling spat (``gosmacs'') than the viability of a byzantine rube goldberg compiler wrapped around gcc.

>2011

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 1:29

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 1:32

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 2:05

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 2:07

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 2:23

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 3:13

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 3:25

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 3:52

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 4:02

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 5:56

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 6:07

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 6:16

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 13:08

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 13:14

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 14:18

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 14:20

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 16:35

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:13

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:14

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:16

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:58

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 17:59

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:01

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:05

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:06

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:10

27 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:24

28 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:29

29 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 18:42

30 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 19:15

31 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-31 20:36

32 Name: Anonymous 2011-11-01 2:14