/prog/ - What is your favourite C compiler?

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:32

tcc

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:34

Clang

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:36

The one I wrote when I was 12.

Name: FrozenVoid 2011-10-20 11:40

Frozens C Compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:53

Frozens
Oh shit! There's more than one of them‽

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:57

favourite
Spell it right fagbox: "favorite". Take your UK-centric wrongness and cram it up your ruddy arse.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:57

GCC

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:00

>>6
The UK version is right. It's really shitty to have different spellings of the same words depending on the location.
Once, I didn't understand why my OpenGL-using code wasn't compiling, it was because I had used the proper spelling `colour'.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:04

>>6
There are two correct ways to approach this. You are not following either of them.

1. What is the name of the language? English. Where does it come from? England. Therefore, the English from England is the canonically correct one.

2. All forms of English are correct as they are naturally created dialects and shouldn't be suppressed.

But you're saying that the American English is correct, and the English English is ``wrong''! That makes no sense!

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:31

>>6
fagbox
Go back to the imageboards, ``please''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:34

>>9
Yes there's 320 million American English speakers and what 20/30 million UK English speakers.

You've been out-voted. Now STFU and spell shit the correct way, dick nose.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:39

>>11

320 million
Is this an argumentum ad populum I am about to read?

speakers
Even you can't argue properly.

Once again, there are only two correct ways of thinking: one is that English English is the canonically correct English and any others are just bastardisations, and the other is that all forms of English are naturally created dialects and none of them are 'wrong' in any sense. To think that American English is the sole correct dialect is bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:42

Is this an argumentum ad populum I am about to read?
Yeah sure, why not? American English is the de facto standard, deal with it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:59

>>13
Read this very carefully, you moron.
all forms of English are naturally created dialects and none of them are 'wrong' in any sense

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:02

>>14
no, your wrong

Name: FrozenVoid 2011-10-20 13:09

>>5
Since they're all closed source you may never know.
Some of the earlier versions also corrupt obj output, so they don't count.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:10

>>15
Care to provide evidence to support your claim?

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:11

>>15
>>17
Hint: "More people write in dialect X, therefore dialect Y is incorrect, bad, evil and shouldn't exist" is not a valid statement.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:13

>>17
Because I said so, argumentum ad verecundiam.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:13

SCC

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:20

>>19
It's nice knowing that you're wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:25

>>21
You mean it's nice know that I'm right and you are wrong. I think that's more like the crux of the matter.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:39

>>21
It's nice knowing that you're enjoy being trolled.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:40

>>6
cool post mate, nice use of "arse" heheh

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 14:39

gcc

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 14:41

>>25
Pronounced 'gucci'.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 14:58

>>26
Don't do that. You're going to lure the spambots.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:03

>>27
Uggucci boots.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:11

>>22
I prefer English English because it retains more of the french influences.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:12

>>18
Actually, that's exactly how semantic and lexical change works.

tcc

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:12

If it ain't Lisp, it's crap.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:36

>>31
Lisp is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 16:19

>>32
No.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 16:24

I love gcc and all its extensions, like being able to intersperse code and declarations and all that kind of thing.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 18:32

LLVM

What is your favourite C compiler?

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:32

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:34

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:36

4 Name: FrozenVoid 2011-10-20 11:40

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:53

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:57

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:57

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:00

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:04

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:31

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:34

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:39

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:42

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:59

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:02

16 Name: FrozenVoid 2011-10-20 13:09

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:10

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:11

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:13

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:13

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:20

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:25

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:39

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:40

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 14:39

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 14:41

27 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 14:58

28 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:03

29 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:11

30 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:12

31 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:12

32 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:36

33 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 16:19

34 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 16:24

35 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 18:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:34

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:36

Name: FrozenVoid 2011-10-20 11:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:53

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:57

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 11:57

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:00

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:31

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:34

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:39

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 12:59

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:02

Name: FrozenVoid 2011-10-20 13:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:11

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:20

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:39

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 13:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 14:39

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 14:41

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 14:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:11

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 15:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 16:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 16:24

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-20 18:32