Post your questions for Stallman here. I'll send him a link to this thread.
First question, it has been said that you do not do much programming any more, due to using your time in other ways. Do you ever miss the times when you would program for hours at a time?
Christians would never stand for it. Lets live in rms's country when he makes one.
Name:
OP.2011-10-13 14:47
There's more. I replied to his email. Thank you so much for answering! I especially enjoyed your answer as to what to do with your life, sage words.
Strangely enough, some people have shown incredulity that these answers are actually coming from you in regards to the sex education question. I think they find it hard that someone they admire for your political action regarding free software has views that teachers should be sexually involved with the students. Personally, I can see the merit in it. As I come from England, when I was growing up it was hardly ever discussed in school, and this lead to a lot of bad decisions by some of the people I knew. Also I've met some women over the years who could probably have benefited from a few lessons in sex ed.
-------------------
His reply
-------------------
Also I've met some women over the years who could probably have benefited from a few lessons in sex ed
I gather that men, in general, need it more than women.
In Mangaia, according to an anthropology book I read, everyone starts having sex in the early teens, and they have sex with most of the teenagers they know, and learn various sorts of "sexual gymnastics". Later they start forming relationships that are deeper than that.
It would be so nice to have grown up in a society that wasn't prudish about sex.
-----------------------
>>48
Listen Captain Autism, these answers are all true.
If you don't believe me, ask him yourself. I feel bad that you will have to bother him before you believe me, but whatever.
Why don't you believe it though? It's all totally plausible, and in keeping with what he puts on his website.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-13 15:56
fakeNOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fakeNOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fakeNOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fakeNOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fakeNOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fakeNOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fakeNOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fakeNOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fakeNOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-13 16:09
le faqueNOT SIGNED WITH A WITTY LISP-RELATED JOKE le faqueNOT SIGNED WITH A WITTY LISP-RELATED JOKE le faqueNOT SIGNED WITH A WITTY LISP-RELATED JOKE le faqueNOT SIGNED WITH A WITTY LISP-RELATED JOKE le faqueNOT SIGNED WITH A WITTY LISP-RELATED JOKE le faqueNOT SIGNED WITH A WITTY LISP-RELATED JOKE le faqueNOT SIGNED WITH A WITTY LISP-RELATED JOKE le faqueNOT SIGNED WITH A WITTY LISP-RELATED JOKE le faqueNOT SIGNED WITH A WITTY LISP-RELATED JOKE
fake NOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fake NOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fake NOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fake NOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fake NOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED fake NOT CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SIGNED
I faxed him, and he said that !L33tUKZj5I is a doodie head. And also he doesn't like proprietary software very much.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-13 19:26
FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN FAKE DUE TO LACK OF CRYPTOSIGN