Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

My Pussy is Wet

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-07 1:47

What's the best dialect of Lisp?

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-07 1:49

Common Lisp: defmacro

---------------

Scheme/Racket: begin-for-syntax syntax-e syntax->datum syntax->list syntax-property #' (void) quote-syntax datum->syntax syntax-parameter-value syntax-rule raise-syntax-error internal-definition-context? syntax-parameterize make-set!-transformer prop:set!-transformer free-identifier=? syntax-local-value/immediate syntax-local-transforming-module-provides? syntax-local-module-defined-identifiers syntax-local-module-required-identifiers make-require-transformer (require (lib "stxparam.ss" "mzlib")) syntax? (require mzlib/defmacro) define-macro syntax-local-lift-expression (require racket/stxparam-exptime) make-rename-transformer syntax-local-require-certifier make-parameter-rename-transformer syntax-local-value define-syntax-parameter make-provide-transformer syntax-local-provide-certifier syntax-source local-expand/capture-lifts local-transformer-expand/capture-lifts syntax-local-lift-values-expression syntax-local-lift-module-end-declaration syntax-local-lift-require syntax-local-lift-provide syntax-local-name syntax-local-context syntax-local-phase-level syntax-local-module-exports syntax-local-get-shadower syntax-local-certifier syntax-transforming? syntax-local-introduce make-syntax-introducer exn:fail:syntax make-syntax-delta-introducer syntax-local-make-delta-introducer syntax-case define-syntax syntax-rules with-syntax syntax-position syntax-line syntax-column ...

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-07 1:59

PicoLisp: functions are lists. They can choose not to evaluate their arguments.

compilation is for dweebs.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-07 2:35

>>3
Sounds like something I made recently. It used reference counting for conses and was slow as HELL.

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-07 2:46

>>1
Fuck you faggot this is a shit thread, I'm taking over it. Is SQL considered turing complete?

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-07 2:54

>>5
Turing completeness in SQL is implemented through advanced standard features, illustrating one reason relatively powerful non-Turing-complete languages are rare: the more powerful the language is initially, the more complex are the tasks to which it is applied and the sooner its lack of completeness becomes perceived as a drawback, encouraging its extension until it is Turing complete.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List