/prog/ - Hashing vs trees

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:16

pick your poison

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:20

hash trees

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:26

dynamically linked lists

WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:30

^{S^{L^{A^{C^KW}A}R}E}_{S_{U_{P_{R_EM}A}C}Y}

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:36

fibonacci butt tree

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:37

>>1
The most stupid question ever. Of course this depends on what you are going to do.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:51

>>6
Maybe they want hash some trees, if you know what I mean

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:59

smoke weed everyday

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 15:31

Hash table with tree linking.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 0:05

smoke weed er^{r^{r^{r^{r^r}}}}day

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 1:44

If I already have an efficient memory manager for cons cells, I'd consider trees. But otherwise hashing.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 3:49

>>6
Everything depends on what you want to do. But what if you take
the context away? What if you stop considering the operations
that will need to be called on the structure? Simply logic should
be enough to decide, for each given context, which solution is
more efficient... but suppose we're only looking at the structure
itself?

My pick is trees, because I can't visualize a hash function... it
just turns into a ball of spaghetti in my mind!

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 4:04

In LoseThos I have a main symbol hash table of like 100,000. My longest linked-list is about 6, I think. A tree instead of linked list doesn't do much for me, but maybe you want a fuller table. I don't think you do.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 6:52

>>13

omg, do you, like, have anything else to talk about, man. "lose the losethos"

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 0:19

this thread is convienent

what is the best way to make a spell checker using a hash table (in sepples)

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 0:35

you'd want a hash function that maps similarly spelt words into the same or close-by bit buckets(?)

And have a bucket for each 'real' word?

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 0:44

>>14
Fuck no, how could he? He's thrown away a decade of his life on something inconceivably pointless. When would he have had time to care about anything else?

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 2:07

>>15
Figure out your matching algorithm (how does "convienent" get matched to "convenient") and build your data structure to support the fastest possible look-up between the two.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 2:08

>>16
Fuck off, n3n7i.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 2:50

>>19
Fuck up, faggot

Hashing vs trees

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:16

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:20

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:26

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:30

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:36

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:37

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:51

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 14:59

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-27 15:31

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 0:05

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 1:44

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 3:49

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 4:04

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-28 6:52

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 0:19

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 0:35

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 0:44

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 2:07

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 2:08

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-29 2:50