Is there a Common Lisp library for playing it? (no pun intended)
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-15 23:27
>>16
Your sentence structure is ugly. Let me fix that for you.
He should have had more trouble with the trig functions and implied real numbers than the infinity symbol. His not believing in any form of infinity weakly implies that he thinks any form of induction (such as how naturals are defined to be repeated application of a successor function (1+) to an initial symbol/value (0)) is bound to fail. Why? I'm not sure, but I think it has to do with an irrealist/solipsist position which only claims that only that which we perceive is real and nothing more and any form of abstract thinking is pointless. This makes me wonder why does he code at all? Coding involves abstract thinking, despite that he claims no such abstract thinking occured and it was just the process of thinking.