GC is shit

discuss

>>173
Java is a joke and so are you.
Not the guy you're replying to but somehow you think Go is more mature than Java? It doesn't even support long lived processes on 32 bit, the GC runs out of memory in no time since it can't tell the difference between a value and a pointer.

Go is the joke, Java is more like satirical comedy.

>>175
It doesn't even support long lived processes on 32 bit, the GC runs out of memory in no time since it can't tell the difference between a value and a pointer.
They need a conservative GC so they can do pointer arithmetic. Go was designed as a systems language, after all. What's that I hear? Go doesn't have pointer arithmetic? They released Go ``1.0'' with a broken GC because they couldn't be bothered to write one that keeps track of pointers? It sure shows how much Google cares about their new language.