Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

If it's not VIM it's shit

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 6:57

I've just discovered that VIM is pretty powerful, has numerous IDE-like features, and is extremely customizable. Fuck Emacs, Gedit, Notepad++, Eclipse, Visual Studio, Xcode, etc.

I've been writing software for over a decade and I have used everything listed above but I always thought of VI/VIM as merely a simple line editor. Why didn't anyone tell me about how awesome VIM truly is?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 7:05

* If it's VIM it's shit

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 7:16

I prefer Emacs.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 7:30

If it's not ed, it's shit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 9:04

Put HJKL on WASD. First person coding.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 9:11

Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 9:51

>>1
Vim is a horrible piece of shit.

Most recent proof: you can't use :buffer command to reliably select a buffer corresponding to a file with curly braces in the name. Because the buffer selection command uses the regex engine in some fairly weird mode(s), which results in it either treating curly braces as special characters or ignoring them completely. Or something, it does fuzzy things. The bottom line is that if you have "{}.h" and "{}.c" opened, you can't select either one by name. Why? Fuck you, that's why.

>>6 You tried to be funny, but s/>/</ and you got it almost right, except that ed should go first (that is, last).

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 10:39

>>7
Why are you even using curly braces in file names or other non-portable characters? Haven't you heard, that's considered harmful!

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 10:40

>>6
I'm sorry, but KDE is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 10:56

>>7
>>6 You tried to be funny, but s/>/</ and you got it almost right, except that ed should go first (that is, last).
Eat a dick you elitist pedantic cock sucking hipster faggot. Enjoy using hard-to-use tools that actually don't work just so you can impress your potential girlfriends your friends your parents.

>>8
yhbt

>>9
I never said I use KDE.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 11:49

Netbeans or GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 11:53

I'd use emacs if it had vim shortcuts.

No, I won't use viper, it's a streaming pile of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 12:18

>>12
Why not define your own keybindings?

Name: VIPPER 2011-08-31 13:16

>>12
Try VIPPER, its VIP QUALITY.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 13:41

>>12
it's a streaming pile of shit
So is your face, U MADE NOW BRO? U MADE?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 13:50

Powerful editors are used as an excuse for weak code.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 13:54

>>16
Do you see any code here?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 15:51

>>17
No, but what I do see are OVER 20LBS OF PUSSY AND ASS!!!

Name: n3n7i 2011-08-31 16:05

I use IDLE and Notepad++  =)

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 16:26

>>19
You're a nigger, who cares if you use crack or meth?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 17:13

Emacs rules

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 20:08

Emacs and vim are both great editors but emacs rules. Funny you never knew vim is like an IDE.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 20:27

I use my own editor. It's web-based so sometimes when I'm at a gaymen faggot's house I point the PS3's browser to my editor, plug in a key board and start hacking.

Name: !L33tUKZj5I 2011-08-31 21:29

Vi or gtfo. Fuck those rsi inducing emacs key combos.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-31 23:56

Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio
Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio
Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio
Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio
Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio
Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio
Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio
Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio
Kate4 > gedit > nano > vi(m) > Emacs > ed > Eclipse > Xcode > Visual Studio

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 3:45

>>25
Sorry, but no.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 11:45

Emacs just feels too quirky, like it was cobbled together in an ad-hoc manner by some old hippie with a long beard and a beer-belly.

Vim on the other hand is lean and mean with a focused user interface.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 12:56

>>26
Sorry, but yes.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 13:22

>>25
gedit lists "undo" and "cut/copy/paste" and "search and replace" as some of its most powerful features.  And its a short list.  Truly ENTERPRISE.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 13:36

>>25
vi(m)

You will be the second. The first who I will kill will be that guy who writes "C/C++"

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 14:43

>>30
I don't pay attention nor do I care for something as shitty as vi(m).

>>32
I'm not asking for your opinion.

>>33
nice dubz

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 15:47

Vim is nice except THE FORCED USE OF MODES.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 15:52

>>32
What else is there?

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 16:48

>>7
if you have "{}.h" and "{}.c" opened

How's your one month of coding experience and zero prospects of employment treating you?

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 16:54

Why do people feel the need to differential between Vi and Vim and by written Vi(m)? PROGTIP: unless you're using a 20 year old BSD distro, you've never used Vi.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 16:54

>>34
That's a tricky question, right? Because it's my fucking immanentized prospects of employment that make me edit files like blah-blah/enterprise.csdms_server-{BPM2.0}-dev/FactoryFactoryFactoryAbstractFactory.ecpp

Pays good though. If only Vim weren't such a nerdshit niggerfaggot autism, I'd be quite happy.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 19:38

>>35
Vim has the ability to rice the fuck out of it with plugins. I mean, what other editor lets you program with your favorite Touhous?

http://imgur.com/2JPfr

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-01 19:43

OVER 20LBS OF PUSSY AND ASS!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 7:53

>>37
You've managed to bring /prog/ full-circle, back to 4chon by injecting Vim with a hearty dose of weeaboo.

Congratulations, sir. Your post is possibly the most on-topic one this board will ever receive.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 8:51

My favorite features of vim would be recording key presses and replaying them (the q and @ commands), and executing a command a specified number of times. Does anyone know off hand if these features are present in emacs, eclipse, or other popular editors? I would be set if others could do it too.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 9:52

>>40
Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 10:05

>>41

Thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 12:12

Vim has more options then Windows. Except you have to know about them beforehand before you can actually change them. Why does vim still not have a settings menu after ~20 years?

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 12:35

>>40
There are free full conversion VIM plugins/add-ons for both Eclipse and Visual Studio 2010.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 12:36

>>43
GUI menu for settings takes up too much effort to build. Easier just to use a text file.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 14:26

>>45
Why didn't they just make an edit.com clone then? Yes, I know vim is probably older then edit.com, that's not the point.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 15:34

>>43
Because gui-configurable options and turing-complete config files can not coexist without causing frustration.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-05 16:11

>>44

wow, thanks, I'll check that out in the future.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List