Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

fuck Emacs

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-27 20:46

I was writing a program on the Emacs and it was like: "bleep, bleep, bleep, bleep, bleep." And then, like, half of my program was gone. And I was like: huh? It devoured my program... It was a really good program. And then I had to write it again and I had to do it fast so it wasn't as good.
It's kind of a bummer...

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-29 13:01

>>39
Imageboards are fucked up. Posting is no more possible.

I can't go back. I'll stay here. Forever.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-29 13:08

>>41
Goddamn it. Fucking imageboards suck.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-29 20:21

There is no God but Allah

Peace be upon Him

Name: VIPP... 2011-08-29 20:37

>>43
JE...

Name: ...ER 2011-08-29 22:42

...WS

Name: fatal_error_restored 2012-06-10 2:15

I personally think emacs and vi both suck balls. Just because there are worse alternatives doesn't make either of these heaps of shit good. Good is an basically absolute term. Better is a relative one. Also, Stallman is a psycopath, but let's not discuss that now.

"Nothing is absolute, except this, mostly. Well it's more absolute than cocoa puffs are chocolate, anyways." --shinymetaldeathgod

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-10 3:22

>>16
Fucking assholes. You people made me feel bad for not getting the reference. Then it turns out the reference is just some stupid mac-aids commercial? To tell with all of you.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-10 5:17

>>46
Acceleration is absolute.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-10 8:32

>>39
fuck off with the shit bolding

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-10 17:00

>>48
That's not absolutely true. There are measures of acceleration which are very much relative.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-10 22:36

>>46

Totally agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-10 22:39

>>51
Exactly. Just compare an actual proper piece of software like Visual Studio 2010 with the clusterfuck that is Emacs, and one can immediately see what a pointless debate this is.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-11 1:45

>>52
proper piece of software like Visual Studio 2010
OH god my sides

Name: supreme camp hat 2012-06-11 4:49

Your Blog is very good, I like it! Thank you for you sharing!Your blog is really helps for my search and i really like it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-11 6:12

CHECK MY DUBS, MALE PROGRAMMER

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-11 6:45

I was checking a dubs on the /prog/ and it was like: "bleep, bleep, bleep, bleep, bleep." And then, like, half of my dubs was gone. And I was like: huh? It devoured my dubs... It was a really good dubs. And then I had to check it again and I had to do it fast so it wasn't as good.
It's kind of a bummer...

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-11 8:03

Rofl, try using a .exe file. Macs do not use .exes because APPLE has a tissy with windows. There OS is capable of using them but its intentionally made incompatible. And that forces you to buy a VPC virtual PC just to run windows to use said programs. While windows can handle .exes and with a simple download it can run mac programs and codecs.

Also there bad for the environment. I work at an e-waste plant and macs are the worst and slowest to dismantle.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-11 11:07

>There OS is capable of using them but its intentionally made incompatible.
False.
>While windows can handle .exes and with a simple download it can run mac programs and codecs.
Windows can't run Mac programs, you dipshit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-11 11:08

>>58
sega master system runs nintendo 64

Name: Anonymous 2012-06-11 11:31

>>58
Technically any OS could run .exes, PE is a clusterfuck of an executable format but it's probably not that hard to parse.
>>57
>And that forces you to buy a VPC virtual PC just to run windows to use said programs
Don't Macs support Windows natively using Boot Camp or whatever? Plus, I'm pretty sure Wine supports OS X.

Newer Posts