/prog/ - are old languages

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-21 23:41

Do people think stuff like C++ and Java are better than Python just because the code looks retarded and gay and Python doesn't?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 0:02

0/10

C++ and Java are PIG DISGUSTING though.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 1:16

haha wait till you meet people who think Lisp is better

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 10:22

Its funny because almost all languages now are implemented in C

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 10:26

The only true answer is {spoiler {b {u {i {o PL/PGSQL}}}}

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 11:13

}}}}
Disgusting.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 11:15

>>4
It's funny because you're wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 12:02

>>4
C is a good language for implementing a better language.

Python is not though.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 15:31

The only true answer is PL/PGSQL

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 21:40

>>8
That's because there is no better language.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 3:31

LISP is old and better than Python.

LISP is better than anything.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 3:47

>>1
The reason why said languages are better than Python is because Python is 50x slower at execution.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 3:53

>>1
Do people think
Does what people think about languages matter to you? Do you have a need to be part of a group?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 4:07

>>11
>this is what homosexuals actually believe

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 4:43

Python is probably one of the worse languages you could choose to use. You'd be better off with Lua.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 7:28

If you're not programming using an assembly language, you're not programming.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 9:00

The irony is that Python is actually a few years OLDER than Java.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 9:15

But Java is even slower than Python.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 9:16

>>16
I program all my Python modules in assembly, I think I'm the only one who saw Python and thought ``Wouldn't it be great if this was unreadable and system/platform/architecture specific?''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 9:59

People think thank C++ is better than Python because of efficiency.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 11:50

>>20
Efficient code will always be efficient, no matter what language it will be written in.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 12:53

>>21
Ruby on Snails.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 13:11

I AM THE KING OF FARTS, BOW DOWN AND SMELL MY HEAVENLY ODORS

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 17:52

>>21
This is what first-year students actually believe.

are old languages

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-21 23:41

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 0:02

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 1:16

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 10:22

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 10:26

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 11:13

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 11:15

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 12:02

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 15:31

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-22 21:40

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 3:31

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 3:47

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 3:53

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 4:07

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 4:43

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 7:28

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 9:00

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 9:15

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 9:16

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 9:59

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 11:50

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 12:53

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 13:11

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-23 17:52