Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Good code

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 13:37

Marketing texts, but cool!!

How to make fewer errors at the stage of code writing:

part 1 - check Maranda IM http://www.viva64.com/en/a/0070/

part 2 - check Games http://www.viva64.com/en/a/0072/

part 3 - check QT library http://www.viva64.com/en/a/0075/

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 13:50

          ∧_∧   / ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
          ( ´∀`) < COOL FREE RINGTONES
        /    |    \________
       /       .|     
       / "⌒ヽ |.イ |
   __ |   .ノ | || |__
  .    ノく__つ∪∪   \
   _((_________\
    ̄ ̄ヽつ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ | | ̄
   ___________| |
    ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄| |

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 14:18

    dgInt32 CalculateConvexShapeIntersection (...)
    {
      ...
      den = dgFloat32 (1.0e-24f) *
            (den > dgFloat32 (0.0f)) ?
               dgFloat32 (1.0f) : dgFloat32 (-1.0f);
      ...
    }

bump

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 19:19

>>3
Awesome code. Great size. Looks concise. Efficient. Elegant. Keep us all posted on your continued progress with any new code factoring or compiler optimization. Show us what you got man. Wanna see how freakin' expressive, efficient, concise and elegant you can get. Thanks for the motivation.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 19:42

>>4
I chuckled and then farted.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 19:44

magic numbers
elegant

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 19:51

>>6
[m]Back to the imageboards, please!

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 19:52

>>7
Oh wow, forget I said that, even I will be going back to the imageboards now!

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 19:59

>>6
It's not a magic number, it's an epsilon value. What's funny is that the smallest possible amount of precision with IEEE754 double precision is around 1e-16, so the compiler will round up the literal value to that.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-16 23:06

my university comp-sci classes didn't prepare me for using Fjölnir in the real world.  now i can't land a single programming job =(

Name: Andrew 2011-08-17 3:44

Anonymous mark: one out of five.

The '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '*' operator.

Read article http://www.viva64.com/ru/a/0072/

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-17 4:01

Wasn't your thread deleted a week ago for blatant advertisement of your shitty site?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-17 4:18

Spam, bacon, sausage and spam
Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
Spam, sausage, spam, spam, spam, bacon, spam tomato and spam
Spam, spam, spam, egg and spam
Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans, spam, spam, spam and spam.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-18 1:22

great! thanks!

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-18 2:01

>>1
>>11
>>14
Samefag spamfag.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-18 2:42

>>15
[a-zA-Z]*fag
Go bzck to /g/

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-18 2:43

>>17
s/bz/ba/

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-18 6:50

>>17
InvalidPointerException

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List