Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Lisp-3

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-13 22:26

The new Lisp-3.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-13 22:45

CL is already a Lisp-n, for any n >= 2.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-14 1:55

>>2
Prove it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-14 2:13

>>3
The proof is in my nut-pudding.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-14 8:03

>>3
Lisp-2 tends to refer to 2 namespaces (values and functions). Symbols tend to have more than 2 namespaces in CL (first they belong to packages, they can represent classes/structures/other objects, they have belong in the functional namespace and value namespace, and the user can definy any namespaces he wants for the symbol (it's a common practice))
This is why classically you can call CL a Lisp-2 to show how it's different from Scheme which is a Lisp-1 (no difference between function and value namespace), but in reality CL is a Lisp-n as it has more than 2 namespaces by default and users tend to add new ones all the time.

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT 2011-08-14 10:36

>>5
tHAT'S OKAY, YOU'VE PROVED TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW YOUR LISP-SHIT. yOU'RE STILL IN THE CORNER.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List