Cool, although I liked the previous 2 other attempts as well.
Confirming what >>2 said was a bit disappointing.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-06 18:58
Isn't this like, against the license, at least for MIT. I guess in theory they could argue 'fair use', but still, I'm pretty sure the use of Online SICP requires you to not redistribute.
I definitely don't like what they did with the diagrams. The font also makes it look like some cheap TEACH YOURSELF SCHEME IN 24 HOURS shit too.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-07 4:57
>>15 I definitely don't like what they did with the diagrams. The font also makes it look like some cheap TEACH YOURSELF SCHEME IN 24 HOURS shit too.
It is called "nextgen".
>>15
On a (small) screen, this version's font is clearer in my opinion.
The notes take too much space.
There's a typo on page 152.
I don't like the new diagrams either.
Page breaks are not distributed strategically.
>>20
It looks like they incorporated the errata, which is good, but introduced a few of their own in the process.
Also the font is too big (or the page is too narrow, depending on how you look at it), forcing tons of hyphenation to the extent that it's distracting.
Good effort, average results. I wish someone would finish the /prog/ version though. It even has a nice vectored front cover.