Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Robotic Waifu

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 2:08

When robotic meidos are smart and capable enough to do house-hold chores and cooking, would you get one as your waifu?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4iwuFTUorQ

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 2:11

It cant even walk. Stupid toy. Big Dog is much more awesome.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 2:20

That's not a meido.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 2:27

She'd rip your dick off during a handjob and she probably has a stainless steel blender vagina to tear your cock to shreds. Unfortunate.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 2:32

>>4
Why would you let her give you a handjob or put your cock into her vagina?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 3:16

>>2
Actually, it can walk, they just didn't demonstrate it in that video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpO57NltoAI

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 3:25

>>6
looks unstable and hardcoded.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 3:34

>>7
Perhaps, but it's a domestic robot and a prototype. Their more recent model can walk twice as fast.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfBpqsqnf80

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 3:39

>>8
domestic robot
Can it associate items with sounds? If I point to a spoon and say "spoon", will it recognize the object I'm refering to, when next time I say "spoon"?

If not, what is the point of this toy?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 3:44

>>9
If not, what is the point of this toy?
It's not a toy, it's a research platform. That point is to provide a platform on which to test and develop such software and technologies.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 3:49

>>10
What about OpenGL with a simple physics engine?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 4:17

>>10
What's the point of graphics rendering on a robot?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:03

>>12
If your software cant work even in controlled environment, where every parameter is known, how will it ever work IRL?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:20

>>13
Because if you don't start to think about solving the problems in a real-world environment with real engineering constraints, you're just wasting your time. You can't just flip a switch one day once you have things performing adequately in a virtual environment and move everything over to a real-world scenario. You'd end up having throw out most of your existing code and start from scratch anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:35

>>14
At least you'll get a general idea and a working prototype. It's much easier to pattern-match opengl rendered teapot, than a real-world teapot.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:36

>>15
Also, with opengl, one will get precise control over the teapot, it's mass, texture and form.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:37

>>15
But it doesn't get you any closer to the goal of actually shipping domestic meido/butler robots. And the companies who first get to that goal post will be the most profitable.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:43

>>17
How do they ever get to that goal, when they have no fucking idea or prototype? In reality, one builds bottom-up, from what he already has, not top-down form goal, which requires some unobtainium and god-like infinite powers.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:47

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_artificial_intelligence#Reasoning_as_search
>combinatorial explosion
That is what you get, going "from the goal".

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:49

>>17-19
You're retarded, I never said working backwards from the goal was good. Where did I say that?

And how is building real-world robots trying to solve some hard real-world engineering problems not "bottom-up"? You can't fucking solve those problems in a vacuum.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:52

>>20
it doesn't get you any closer to the goal of actually shipping domestic meido/butler robots

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:55

>>20
You can't fucking solve those problems in a vacuum.
CAD programs build on the real world model.

And how is building real-world robots trying to solve some hard real-world engineering problems not "bottom-up"?
You can't control real-world. That is why nowadays everyone uses CADs, instead of building billions IRL prototypes.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 5:58

I can't enjoy it if I can't degrade and corrupt it. Even if it's simulated.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 6:13

>>4
As frequent visitor of /d/, I highly approve such robots.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 9:51

>>24
go back to the imageboards

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-06 10:10

>>25
fuck you faggot
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -