/prog/ - SBCL — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 2:05

I'M COMPUTER SON OF A BITCH SBCL SBCL IS PIG DO YOU WANT A SHITTY COMPILER? DO YOU WANT A 100 MEGABYTE BINARY? SBCL IS PIG DISGUSTING WILLIAM NEWMAN IS A MURDERER FUCKING LISP

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 2:15

it can into tail calls at least. But other than that...

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 9:59

>>1
What are you talking about?
With the correct runtime options my SBCL goes down to 768KB memory.
Hm, seems like sb-ext:save-lisp-and-die still generates a 41MB image.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 13:33

>>3
Unfortunate.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 13:50

Still fast, and you never heard of tree-shaking/pruning.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 14:59

>>5
That's irrelevant to this topic, as SBCL doesn't use a tree-shaker. And probably won't ever use a tree-shaker. Ever.

enjoy rolling your own

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 19:24

Though SBCL is just Java fast...

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 20:31

>>7
SBCL compiled code can be faster than Java.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 21:44

>>8
Well, it can be faster than Java but that's not really the general case.

Though being as fast or faster than Java isn't really that bad considering how high-level CL is.

SBCL

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 2:05

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 2:15

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 9:59

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 13:33

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 13:50

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 14:59

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 19:24

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 20:31

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-03 21:44