[m]<!-- script for disable text selection call function above implemented -->
<script type="text/javascript">
disableMouseSelection(document.body) //disable text selection on entire body of page
</script><script type="text/javascript">
var somediv=document.getElementById("captchdiv")
disableMouseSelection(somediv) //disable text selection within DIV with id="mydiv"
</script><script type="text/javascript">
var alltables=document.getElementsByTagName("table")
for (var i=0; i<alltables.length; i++)
disableMouseSelection(alltables[i]) //disable text selection within all tables on the page
</script>[/m]
Oh my Sussman! This is ridiculous.
Dedekind's approach was essentially to adopt the idea of one-to-one correspondence as a standard for comparing the size of sets, and to reject the view of Galileo (which derived from Euclid) that the whole cannot be the same size as the part. An infinite set can simply be defined as one having the same size as at least one of its proper parts; this notion of infinity is called Dedekind infinite. The diagram gives an example: viewing lines as infinite sets of points, the left half of the lower blue line can be mapped in a one-to-one manner (green correspondences) to the higher blue line, and, in turn, to the whole lower blue line (red correspondences); therefore the whole lower blue line and its left half have the same cardinality, i.e. "size".