1
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 3:15
DRIVE THE LISP MENACE OUT OF /prog/ !
http://www.ioccc.org/rules.html
Same rules apply, except
replace all instances of C with Haskell.
By contributing your innovative yet unreadable Haskell code, you help
/prog/ return to its former glory, sans the countless autistic Lispers.
This contest lasts until:
A) /prog/ is terminated
B) /prog/ returns to non-Lisp GLORY
C) A spambot destroys the thread
Take note, my fellow
/prog/rammers :
Lisp is a cancer , and the ones who advocate its use must be rehabilitated. Lispers are all around you, and they may include: your mother, father, siblings, even your best friend . We must guide them back to non-Lisp glory. Good luck, /prog/ .
3
Name:
VIPPER
2011-07-02 3:51
>>1
/prog/ was always about lisp.
4
Name:
VIPPER
2011-07-02 3:52
>>1
/prog/ was always about lisp.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 3:53
Haskell is for whining pedants
7
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 5:13
I can't even read regular Haskell.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 5:58
Obfuscated Haskell is an oxymoron.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 6:01
>>7
You don't have Phd in type theory? Why are you even programming?
10
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 6:41
#include <stdio.h>
main(t,_,a)
char
*
a;
{
return!
0<t?
t<3?
main(-79,-13,a+
main(-87,1-_,
main(-86, 0, a+1 )
+a)):
1,
t<_?
main(t+1, _, a )
:3,
main ( -94, -27+t, a )
&&t == 2 ?_
<13 ?
main ( 2, _+1, "%s %d %d\n" )
:9:16:
t<0?
t<-72?
main( _, t,
"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;\
#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/+k#;\
q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]'/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; \
r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#\
\
n'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c ;;\
{nl'-{}rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;\
#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}##(!!/")
:
t<-50?
_==*a ?
putchar(31[a]):
main(-65,_,a+1)
:
main((*a == '/') + t, _, a + 1 )
:
0<t?
main ( 2, 2 , "%s")
:*a=='/'||
main(0,
main(-61,*a, "!ek;dc i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry")
,a+1);}
13
Name:
1000 posts
2011-07-02 7:30
●█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▅███████▅▄▃▂
███sage tank███████►
◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲☼◤
14
Name:
1000 posts
2011-07-02 7:31
●█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▅███████▅▄▃▂
███sage tank███████►
◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲☼◤
15
Name:
1000 posts
2011-07-02 7:31
●█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▅███████▅▄▃▂
███sage tank███████►
◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲☼◤
16
Name:
1000 posts
2011-07-02 7:31
●█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▅███████▅▄▃▂
███sage tank███████►
◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲☼◤
17
Name:
1000 posts
2011-07-02 7:31
●█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▅███████▅▄▃▂
███sage tank███████►
◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲☼◤
18
Name:
1000 posts
2011-07-02 7:32
●█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▅███████▅▄▃▂
███sage tank███████►
◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲☼◤
19
Name:
1000 posts
2011-07-02 7:32
●█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▄▅███████▅▄▃▂
███sage tank███████►
◥☼▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲☼◤
24
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 15:44
>>1
cancer
This is not /b/, although it is filled with /b/ scum like you now.
25
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 16:01
only unproductive leaches hate Lisp
26
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 16:07
>>25
I'm a productive leech and I
fucking hate Lisp.
29
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 17:04
>>28
because youre a fucking phyton faggot
30
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 17:07
>>29
I'm not homosexual, neither do I see the Python programming language as a good thing. I do, however, see it as something much better than being Lost In a Sea of Parentheses.
32
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 20:10
>>30
I would wager that if you rewrote emacs in C, it would have about the same number of parentheses.
35
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 23:10
I can post enough Lisp code that you can't port to C, but I'll leave you to waste your own time.
36
Name:
Anonymous
2011-07-02 23:32
>>35
I never said C can replace Lisp you fucking retard.