Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Souce control.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-04 19:54

Why does /prog/ never discuss source control?

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-04 20:08

It's SE, /prog/ iswants to be more about CS and the theoretical aspect of programming, or Lisp circlejerking.

In the Haskell era, /prog/'s choice was darcs for obvious reasons.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-04 20:26

/python/ uses mercurial

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-04 20:39

>>3
That's why it sucks.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-04 21:20

Fuck, I LOVE souce control!

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-04 21:45

Why would we?  Nobody needs anything other than git.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-04 23:21

In order of worst to best

cvs
svn
git

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-04 23:44

>>7

>use git for everything. i know because i've tried THREE, yes THREE SCM before.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 1:16

>>8
I thought that was funny too. On the other hand, those are the only 3 I'd actually think to reach for. Mercurial's probably better than cvs at least though.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 1:46

>>8
Wow, you've almost scratched the surface.  I've used (in no particular order) clearcase, rcs, cvs, svn, hg (mercurial), git, and bazaar.  You'll find plenty more out there; try to be a little more experienced before striking an authoritative tone.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 2:26

>>10
Why bother listing cvs and rcs separately?

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 3:39

>>10
Clearcase
BARF

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 4:45

>>10
>>8
huh?

>>7
there, ftfy

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 4:47

>>10

because RCS "just works". CVS doesn't. To speak with the words of Linus Torvals:

CVS sucks. Also, I'm really not good at doing this talking stuff. Oh, and all you guys at Google suck. If you use CVS, you suck. Everyone sucks but me. Yay, I wrote a Kernel! You suck! I am god! [mostly sic from a tech talk at Google]

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 6:53

>>14
Boo hoo, I don't understand humour and it makes me upset!

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 7:37

>>15
I'm British.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 9:45

>>16
I'm wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 9:56

>>15-17
I'm quoting non-existent text.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 11:11

>>18
The jews are after me.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 11:44

>>19
The jews are after him

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-05 16:58

>>19-20
jew spam is funny, amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 2:04

>>12
Yes, clearcase was the worst.  Most of those I've used because they were mandated by whatever project I was working at the time.  I'd like to say the manager who chose clearcase got fired for his poor decision, but he's actually been promoted since then.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 3:20

>>21
Get yo' ass ready, bitch, here's an incomplete list of Jews that control(led) America.

Paul Warburg, leading advocate of the creation of the Federal Reserve (the most powerful monetary agency in history), served on the Federal Reserve Board of Directors.

Charles Sumner Hamlin, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

William Proctor Gould Harding, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Eugene Isaac Meyer, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Eugene Robert Black, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Arthur Frank Burns, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Paul Adolph Volcker, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Alan C. Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Ben Shalom Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Paul Wolfowitz, former president of the World Bank, former Deputy Secretary of Defense, leading advocate of the US invasion of Iraq.

Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner.
 
Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company.
 
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd.
 
Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios.
 
Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc.
 
Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric.
 
Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 4:00

Due to company politics and "herp derp it's free so it must be shit right?", we have to use Perforce at work. It's fucking terrible. I can't believe how the Perforce creators can stay in business peddling shit like that.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 6:36

>>22
Try SourceSafe, prepare to re-evaluate your life.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 11:33

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 17:39

>>25
LOL using at using anything MS especially when you really meant to use Git.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 17:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 18:55

>>27
Oh aren't you fucking cool. You can lol on the internet. Nice job bitch. You're below average.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 19:02

>>29
lolololollololololollolololoololololololoololololollololololollolololoololololololoololololollololololollolololoololololololoololololollololololollolololoololololololoololololollololololollolololoololololololool

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 19:02

>>30
xpert bbcodefag xD

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 19:04

>>31
Oh aren't you fucking cool. You can xD on the internet. Nice job bitch. Get the fuck out.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 19:06

>>32
You replied to the wrong person mental midget boy.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 19:07

>>33
Oh aren't you fucking cool. You can insult people on the internet. Nice job bitch. You're below MY ANUS.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 21:25

>>1
You might as well ask
Why do loners never talk about Facebook?

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 22:24

Use git because that's what the largest amount of people use.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 23:33

>>25
This. So many times this. I've had to use VSS with the company I work for and I've literally never seen software so bad.

Pidgin, CVS, whatever horrible creature you can fashion from the quintessential bogeymen of software is much better than VSS. VSS is supposed to be a basic versioned filesystem, except it fails miserably at that task. Some of the dialog boxes I've seen have random strings of meaningless extended ASCII. I showed one of those to my coworker and he just laughed.

It regularly screws up file histories (to a point where you can easily lose hours of work if you're not careful) and its integration with Visual Studio is about as good as you'd expect considering that it's VSS. If Visual Studio crashes for any reason, VSS goes HERP LET ME REPLACE YOUR MODIFIED FILES WITH THE ORIGINALS. I SEE VISUAL STUDIO CRASHED, THAT MUST BE WHAT YOU WANT.

It's slow as fuck because there's no central marker for revisions, each file history is maintained on its own. This means that it has to check every fucking file.

There's nothing about it that's suitable for a team of any size. Seriously.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-06 23:51

http://www.mks.com/platform/our-product

ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS INTEGRATIONS PLATFORM

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-07 0:07

I used to be a big fan of subversion prior to dvcs catching on.  I learned git and mercurial simultaneously, and used mercurial for about a year as my primary vcs.  About 6 months ago I switched to git, since I liked working on some other projects that use it more than mercurial.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-07 9:15

/prog/ doesn't discuss version control because autists are basement dwellers still in school that will never have to share oxygen with another human being let alone code.

Clearly, not ready for enterprise.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-07 9:45

>>40
Clearly, this thread does not exist.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-07 11:14

>/prog/ doesn't discuss version control
About 54 results (0.22 seconds) for "version control" site:http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-07 11:35

DICKS

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-07 12:04

Little girls

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-07 13:03

>>42

You can get proper quotes if you leave a space after the greater than, dear friend.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-07 19:12

>>45
Your message was perhaps one of the strangest pieces of email I have ever received. Although it is flattering to have a ``fan club'', in fact, it is a very bad idea. Unlike most of human society, science and engineering are based on the idea that each of us is capable of evaluating evidence and thinking on our own. Each of us can do experiments, work out the reasoning, and determine the truth for ourselves. There is no room in science or engineering for ``fans'' representing group approval over individual thought. One of my heros, Galileo, put it very well:

In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.

I am pleased to talk with people about matters of science or engineering, so you and your colleagues may certainly send me mail. I hope to learn as much from your experiences as you may learn for me. But please get rid of the ``cult of personality'' way of thinking. It is unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-07 19:14

>>46
Also applies to >>39.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List