OFFENSIVE TITLE

HIGHLY OFFENSIVE RANT ABOUT HASKELL

AUTISM

MORE AUTISM

EVEN MORE AUTISM

OHGOD AUTISM EVERYWHERE

LISP

LISP IS GOOD

LISP IS BETTER THAN EVERYTHING YOU BELIEVE IN

LISP GIVES ME A RAGING BONER

I WANT TO MARRY LISP

OH LORD IN HEAVEN I LOVE LISP SO MUCH I WOULD KILL MYSELF FOR LISP

ALSO EMACS

WINDOWS IS PIG DISGUSTING

I AM USING SOLARIS BECAUSE I KNOWS TEH LUNIX

AND TOTALLY NOT BECAUSE I AM FUCKING STUCK AT MY JOB AS SERVER ADMINISTRATOR (ALSO A RONERY FAGGOT)

>>85
I merely argue that you cannot find the end of the set and thus you may as well call it infinite.
So, seeing a single finite cell id, that there is an "infinte set" number of such cells? Nice inference!

Natural numbers are not defined in any physical way, they are defined by axioms.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogma

maximum informational content possible within the universe as the maximum number you can have is not a valid argument as other universes can exist
That is Pascal's Waget at its best! You should believe in X, because X can exist. Also "can exist" is a little ambiguous quality.