java vs c#

Java or C#, which language do you prefer and why?

cat shit vs dog shit

isnt c# java in fast?

C# because it has better libraries, better features, better GOOIE, and isn't wtf like Java can be.

Java, because I hate C# standard library's function names with capital first letter

The only thing Java has on C# is portability.

If you could compile C# on an OS other than Windows, it would be C# hands down.

>>6
Use Mono. Just kidding.

>>7
Mono is perfectly fine.

>>8
No, Mono is cromulent and that's a difference.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItSyGn7pUV0

>>6
You can compile C# to Javascript: http://hildr.luminance.org/Platformer/Platformer.html (won't run on Opera, or older Chrome, or dev Chromes, though).

>>10
Java isn't Javascript.

>>11
I think the point was:
If you could compile C# on an OS other than Windows

>>12
Possibly. But I still think the person is confusing Java with Javascript. Hence why I made the comment.

I think Sepples beats them both.

>>13 No, I was not and frankly you have to be retarded to think otherwise.

>>15
Then why would you mention Javascript? The OP was asking about Java vs C#. And prior to your winner post, everyone managed to stay on topic. Again, I think the reason why you mentioned Javascript is because you thought it was Java.

*Clearly* Javascript is the *script* of Java.  Duh..
(And yes, that was deliberate)

>>17
Are you trying to troll me or are you just plain dumb?

>>16,6,12
Come on. Get with the fucking program.

>>19
Fine.

The jews are after me.


Happy now?

>>14

This man.

Not slow like Java, nor platform dependent like C#. C++ > *

>>20
They stopped, you said so yourself.

>>21
Try more, that was mediocre.

>>21
3/10

>>21
-∞/10

>>22
They started again.

>>16
Because now C# can be compiled to Javascript (with a well-defined way to rewrite calls to external native dependencies, such as XNA base libraries), which means that it's quite crossplatform now, i.e. runs or on any relevant platform. So that argument in favor of Java is no longer valid.

You are a living proof that autism doesn't necessary result in heightened intelligence, in any interpretation of intelligence.

>>27
You're talking to yourself

C# and java are synatx wise almost simlar. For a small development C# is better and a large scale development java is better. C# is simple to study check the following link.

http://csharp.net-informations.com

saadli.

Oracle vs Microsoft

I choose PLT

Time to remind javamonkeys about how they suffer:

- no closures
- no lambdas
- no properties
- no templates
- no delegates, events
- no partial classes
- no deterministic finalization
- no LINQ
- no extension methods
- no implicit interface implementations
- no optional parameters
- no adequate memory usage
- no fast applications
- no sane IDE, no standart GUI
- no anonymous data types
- no operator overloading
- no tail call optimizations
- no Silverlight, Windows Forms, WPF, WCF, XNA

Also: http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/1861/1315853243150.png

-no closures
Wrong.

- no lambdas
Useless.

>- no properties
Syntactic sugar.

- no templates
Wrong.

- no delegates, events
Delegate functionality can be achieved with reflection and Method class' methods.

- no partial classes
Wrong.

- no deterministic finalization
Wrong.

- no LINQ
https://github.com/nicholas22/jpropel-light

- no extension methods
Useless.

- no implicit interface implementations
You're right there.

- no optional parameters
Useless syntactic sugar.

- no adequate memory usage
Same with C#

- no fast applications
Java is quite fast.

- no sane IDE, no standart GUI
Eclipse is a better IDE than VS will ever be, not that you need an IDE at all. Swing (that can look native nowadays) is the standard GUI framework.

- no anonymous data types
Useless.

- no operator overloading
Useless syntactic sugar that makes your code unreadable and horrid; the lack of this is a Good Thing.

- no tail call optimizations
JVM can optimize recursion on return, wrong.

- no Silverlight, Windows Forms, WPF, WCF, XNA
Lack of this proprietary filth is a bonus.

no properties
Syntactic sugar.
Lol'd at javamonkey >>32

>>33
I don't even like Java.

>>34
So what the hell are you doing here with your lack of knowledge of the topic?

>>35
Pointing out you're lack of knowledge.

>>36
No, the correct word for your action is "trolling". See http://csharpindepth.com/articles/chapter8/propertiesmatter.aspx