/prog/ - C style — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 17:44

Hey /prog/,

I know basic C and don't want a tutorial on pointers and that. I'm looking for a tutorial on style (e.g. it would be a nice idea to provide a <structure>_free function for any struct <structure>_t that I create, etc.) -- where can I find this? The GNU guideline doesn't discuss this.

Reading code might be an idea but I really wouldn't know where to start, and I could end up picking up bad style. So some kind of guide that you think is good would be nice.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 17:46

Check out

http://www.nambla.org

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 17:51

>>1 check out the git source

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:10

>>1
C has no correct style, do what you want.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:17

>>4
>implying any language has style

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:18

>>5
Lisp has a pretty natural style, Python forces his whitespaces down your throat until you choke on them and then rapes your dead body, Pascal, Java, C#, and other languages have a pretty ``standardized'' style (because their standard libraries don't suck as much as C's).

Also, go back to the imageboards.

Name: Fuck you, !Ep8pui8Vw2 2011-05-31 18:23

>>6
Lisp has a pretty natural style
AHAHAHAHAHA

back to the imageboards
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Go back to /b/, !uaVa00FkCs 2011-05-31 18:25

>>7
Go back to /b/, ``please''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:29

So, uh, say I still want to use C, what do I do?

Sure can't be the standard libraries' fault. Aren't there for instance "common idioms" on caller vs. callee doing memory deallocation?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:30

>>8
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ █ ___ █ █ // 7 █ █ (_,_/\ WORSHIP THIS █ █ \ \ YOUR THROBBING GOD █ █ \ \ █ █ _\ \__ █ █ ( \ ) █ █ \___\___/ █ █ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:38

Use whatever style that the projects you work on use. If you are interested in GNU style, perhaps you can look at the source code for the GNU coreutils.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:49

GNU coreutils
Worst C coding style ever.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 19:06

>>12
While I agree, the OP mentioned the GNU Guidelines, so I decided to be productive rather than insult his tastes.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 19:19

Uh yeah I just didn't know where to look. If there's other guidelines feel free to point them out.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:37



    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄

    █     ___                        █

    █    //  7                       █

    █   (_,_/\       WORSHIP THIS    █

    █    \    \   YOUR THROBBING GOD █

    █     \    \                     █

    █     _\    \__                  █

    █    (   \     )                 █

    █     \___\___/                  █

    █                                █

    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:42

      ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
      █    ___ █
      █ // 7    █
      █   (_,_/\    WORSHIP THIS █
      █ \ \   YOUR THROBBING GOD █
      █    \ \    █
      █    _\ \__ █
      █ (   \    )    █
      █    \___\___/ █
      █ █
      ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:44

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
    █    ___ █
    █ // 7    █
    █   (_,_/\    WORSHIP THIS █
    █ \ \   YOUR THROBBING GOD █
    █    \ \    █
    █    _\ \__ █
    █ (   \    )    █
    █    \___\___/ █
    █ █
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:44

_{▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄

    █    ___ █

    █ // 7    █

    █   (_,_/\    WORSHIP THIS █

    █ \ \   YOUR THROBBING GOD █

    █    \ \    █

    █    _\ \__ █

    █ (   \    )    █

    █    \___\___/ █

    █ █

    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀}

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 21:26

http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle
Linux kernel coding style.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 22:51

it would be a nice idea to provide a <structure>_free function for any struct <structure>_t that I create

Why?

Name: VIPPER 2011-06-01 3:50

You know its summer when /prog/ is shit.

Name: JORAGO MUSTAFO 2011-06-01 5:23

>>17-18
UM KWAT MUMFALA

UM KWAT MUMFALA

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 7:20

>>21
Oh fuck, it's summer~

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 8:02

>>23
lets go 2 teh bitch (taht means ur mom lol)

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 9:42

>>21
Would that mean it's always summer in /prog/?

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 10:18

>>25
Only when /g/, /lounge/, /b/, spammers and domyhoemworkzplzs take over /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 12:06

>>21
SUMMER ALL YEAR ROUND

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 12:08

>>27
Good. Now you have the perfect excuse to wear your sisters black leggings out in public. Because it's too warm to be wearing jeans.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 13:00

It's ``bad style'' to name your structs <struct>_t, since POSIX reserves the use of *_t names.

Name: Autistic Duck 2011-06-01 13:20

>>27
ETERNAL SUMMER OF THE SPOTLESS PROG

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 1:16

>>23
lol u tk him 2da bar|?

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 2:01

>>12
GNU coreutils
Worst C coding ever.

Fixed

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 2:53

Good C style for a large project: Windows 2000

http://www.mediafire.com/?dkkqh480ervgewa

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 6:22

>>33
.zip.gz

C style

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 17:44

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 17:46

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 17:51

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:10

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:17

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:18

7 Name: Fuck you, !Ep8pui8Vw2 2011-05-31 18:23

8 Name: Go back to /b/, !uaVa00FkCs 2011-05-31 18:25

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:29

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:30

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:38

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:49

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 19:06

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 19:19

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:37

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:42

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:44

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:44

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 21:26

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 22:51

21 Name: VIPPER 2011-06-01 3:50

22 Name: JORAGO MUSTAFO 2011-06-01 5:23

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 7:20

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 8:02

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 9:42

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 10:18

27 Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 12:06

28 Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 12:08

29 Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 13:00

30 Name: Autistic Duck 2011-06-01 13:20

31 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 1:16

32 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 2:01

33 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 2:53

34 Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 6:22

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 17:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 17:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 17:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:17

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:18

Name: Fuck you, !Ep8pui8Vw2 2011-05-31 18:23

Name: Go back to /b/, !uaVa00FkCs 2011-05-31 18:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:29

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:30

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 18:49

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 19:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 19:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:37

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 20:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 21:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-31 22:51

Name: VIPPER 2011-06-01 3:50

Name: JORAGO MUSTAFO 2011-06-01 5:23

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 7:20

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 8:02

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 9:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 10:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 12:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 12:08

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-01 13:00

Name: Autistic Duck 2011-06-01 13:20

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 1:16

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 2:01

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 2:53

Name: Anonymous 2012-07-13 6:22