/prog/ - Best Common LISP implementation?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 1:10

Alright, /prog/lodytes. I've decided to learn the one true language. I was going to go with clisp, but it seems to get trolled into the ground here. Can I get a ranked list of lisp implementations? You can throw in your Scheme-ing and other lisps if you think they're better for learning. Only rule: they must use S-expressions homoiconically.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 1:35

SBCL

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 2:14

S_B^CL

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 3:18

RACKET!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 3:20

SBCL/Clozure/LispWorks for CL, MIT/GNU Scheme for doing SICP, Chicken for Scheme, Racket for Racket.

Name: >>5 2011-05-26 3:22

Clozure if you're on Windows, SBCL otherwise. LispWorks for Real World ENTERPRISE Scalable Applications.
SBCL is the fastest.
CLISP is for toying.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 5:51

I already answered thsi question a dozen times explaining the differences between each implementation. I'm not going to do it again, learn to use google search or /prog/scape. In short: SBCL or ClozureCL is the way to go. Also get Emacs, SLIME, Paredit and maybe Redshank as well.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 6:25

no thuch thing, becauthe lithp ith for faggotth

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 6:48

>>8
Stop spamming every Lisp thread that you see.
Someone should report you to MrVacBob, but you aren't worth anyone's time, a better solution would be to add you to the filter.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 7:05

>>9
"lithp|faggotth"?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 7:10

>>10
Yes, or maybe just the letters from the replace part of the search and replace he runs over his lines.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 8:32

>>9-11
fаggots. both of you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 11:49

go for new style lisp, use clojure

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 12:13

CLISP is for toying.
What about http://code.google.com/p/lisp5000/ ? It looks better as a toy and you can easily embed it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 12:30

>>13
Clojure has no TCO and you have to learn Java to go anywhere.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 12:35

>>14
Toying != toy.

Best Common LISP implementation?

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 1:10

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 1:35

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 2:14

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 3:18

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 3:20

6 Name: >>5 2011-05-26 3:22

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 5:51

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 6:25

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 6:48

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 7:05

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 7:10

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 8:32

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 11:49

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 12:13

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 12:30

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-26 12:35