/prog/ - Pearls — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-17 17:10

I was told Perl was some complicated masterful thing that was hard to learn and puts python to shame

easier then basic to learn and exact same functionality... am i missing something

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:37

>>16
You can only have references in arrays, not other arrays. It's pretty elementary stuff. Now go fuck a goat.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:38

>>17
goat
a new o'reilly book?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:40

>>18
http://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=ruby+in+a+nutshell

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:42

>>19
So >>17-san was saying ``go learn Ruby''?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:44

puts is a really fucking stupid word. I will never touch Ruby so long as I'd have to use that disgusting piece of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:47

>>21
``puts'' is a jewish word for a ``penis''

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:49

>>22
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_of_Yiddish_origin
putz: (vulgar) an idiot, a jerk; a penis (from Yiddish פּאָץ pots)

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:58

>>22
>>23
Matz confirmed for Jewish scumbag. That's what he gets for being a Mormon.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:06

>>24
Matz being a Mormon.
Yep. That's a little unusual for a Japanese.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:28

>>21

Ruby has puts and print. Take your pick, they both do effectively the same thing.

Also...



var = "Imma let you finish but Ruby Interpolation of strings is fucking badass"

print "But seriously you can #{var} do awesome shit with ruby\n"

Name: Code Less, Create More 2011-05-18 21:35

Lisp



World:'Earth  say "Hello, $World!"

Ruby



var = "Imma let you finish but Ruby Interpolation of strings is fucking badass"

print "But seriously you can #{var} do awesome shit with ruby\n"

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:49

>>27

There are no parenthesis in that, it is not lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:58

c and perl?

TANAMI BROWNE'D

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:03

>>26
p, puts, and print do different shit.
they're not exactly the same.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:04

$var = "Imma let you finish but PHP Interpolation of strings is fucking badass";

print "But seriously you can {$var} do awesome shit with PHP\n";

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:18

>>28
code-as-data = Lisp

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:38

>>32
code-as-data = Lisp
Tcl is clearly a Lisp, Io is clearly a Lisp. NO THEY ARE NOT YOU FUCKING RETARD

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:59

Congrats, retards. You just realized that all of your fancy scripting languages are just copies of each other with slight differences in syntax.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:01

>>34
Congratulations, you've just restated what >>6 said, without saging, without giving an actual contribution to the discussion, being a cock-loving faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:04

>>33
But TCL doesnt have macros!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:04

Congrats, retards. You just realized that all of your fancy scripting languages are just copies of each other with slight differences in syntax.

it deeply upsets me how hardly anyone can see this

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:23

Lisp and Java are one and the same.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:30

>>36
Macros do not imply homoiconicity.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:37

>>39
Without code as lists, you cant have macros.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 0:22

>>40
I can have a Lisp with only vectors.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:27

>>41
As long as you don't have syntax-objects, you should be ok.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:29

>>42
I can have a Lisp with only syntax-objects.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:51

>>43
Then you deserve to die, dildomason-jewshiteater.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:56

>>44
Stop making Lispers look bad.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:02

>>45
Stop betraying pure conses!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:05

>>46
I thought you liked Clojure.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:18

>>47
The only alive Lisp nowadays is Common one.
schemes, rackets and clojures are unforgivable DERAIL.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:38

>>48
I may be a CL user, but I don't see how the other ones are not alive. If a language has healthy and well-maintained implementations, it can be considered alive, and those that you mention do fit the criteria.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:18

>>48
You're calling Clojure a Lisp but you also said it must have conses.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:38

>>49 >>50
They are alive but they are not really lisps. Derailed shit.
BTW maybe u confusing me with someone.
My third post at this board.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:42

>>51
Right, you said Lisp and not LISP.

Then, read your SICP or just fuck off already, we've got enough shit to deal for now.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:52

>>52
Fuck off, lithper ((faggot)).

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 6:05

>>53
Fuck off, C; {faggot};

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 6:36

>>54
At least I don't need a special IDE to work out the stupidity of my language, faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 7:44

>>55
But you have a compilation time exponentially proportional to the execution time.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 7:44

>>56
s/ a//

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 21:35

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_typing
A programming language is said to use static typing when type checking is performed during compile-time as opposed to run-time. Statically typed languages include C++, Haskell, Java, Perl (with respect to distinguishing scalars, arrays, hashes and subroutines)

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 22:10

>>58
CL is static typed, it distinguishes functions and variables.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 22:52

>>59
It is called strong typing, not "static typing"

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 22:58

>>60

(setq f (lambda (x) x))

(f 3)

No.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 23:46

>>61
He said CL nubface.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 23:46

>>61
you're doing it wrong



(setf (symbol-function 'f) (lambda (x) x))

(f 3)

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 0:30

>>63
@{$scalar}

Pearls

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-17 17:10

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:37

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:38

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:40

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:42

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:44

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:47

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:49

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:58

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:06

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:28

27 Name: Code Less, Create More 2011-05-18 21:35

28 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:49

29 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:58

30 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:03

31 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:04

32 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:18

33 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:38

34 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:59

35 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:01

36 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:04

37 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:04

38 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:23

39 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:30

40 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:37

41 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 0:22

42 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:27

43 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:29

44 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:51

45 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:56

46 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:02

47 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:05

48 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:18

49 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:38

50 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:18

51 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:38

52 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:42

53 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:52

54 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 6:05

55 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 6:36

56 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 7:44

57 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 7:44

58 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 21:35

59 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 22:10

60 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 22:52

61 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 22:58

62 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 23:46

63 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 23:46

64 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 0:30

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-17 17:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:37

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:47

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:49

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 20:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:28

Name: Code Less, Create More 2011-05-18 21:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:49

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 21:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:59

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:23

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:30

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 23:37

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 0:22

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:27

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:29

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 1:56

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:02

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:05

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 2:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 4:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 6:05

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 6:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 7:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 7:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 21:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 22:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 22:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 22:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 23:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-19 23:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-20 0:30