Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

LANGUAGES THAT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 11:35

PYTHON
RUBY
C++
C#
OBJECTIVE C
JAVA
BASIC

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 11:40

You forgot Perl.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 11:42

cobol

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 11:53

>>2
Have fun using AWK and sed.

Name: LISPPER 2011-05-12 12:08

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 12:09

Whitespace

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 12:56

>>1 ``faggot" detected

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 13:43

I don't understand all the Python hate, is it just trolling or what? There are a few things I dislike about it, but I would say that overall it's a pretty good language.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 13:47

>>8
They hate the forced indentation of code.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 13:49

>>8
- Slow by design
- Forced one-linerisation of lambda functions
- Internal "namespace" bracketed by double-underscores must frequently be used by code that shouldn't have to (if __name__ == "__main__":)

I'm sure someone who's had to use it more than I have can add more to this list. Oh, and if you need explanation of any of these problems or can't see them by yourself, you aren't qualified enough to rate it as a language.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 13:58

- Internal "namespace" bracketed by double-underscores must frequently be used by code that shouldn't have to
Care to suggest a better way to clearly deliniate internal identifiers

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:02

>>11
Actual namespaces.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:05

>>12
Like what? python.name thisfile.name internal.name python.main thisfile.main internal.main

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:08

>>13
I don't fucking know, I'm just criticising it, not actually rewriting the whole shitty thing. Choosing a naming scheme for that is arbitrary anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:09

>>14
So then what would you consider a better alternative to the language?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:10

>>13
Actually, how about redesigning it to avoid that shit altogether?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:13

>>15
What the fuck kind of question is that? If you're not an idiot, you can tell whether a language is good or bad, no comparisons necessary. So just try some until one is good enough.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:14

FIST FUCKING IS AMAZING

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:15

>>1-

Fuck you, ``faggots"

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:17

>>16
Ok, so how could one clearly delineate internal identifiers that is better than what Python currently does.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:23

I've got some thoughts about this:

1) Python is great
2) FIOC is great
3) SEPPLES is great
4) >>1 sucks cock

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:30

Programming languages should be designed not by piling features on top of features, but by removing the weaknesses and restrictions that make the additional features appear necessary.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:39

Programming languages should be designed to get shit done.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:52

Programming languages should be designed.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:53

Programming

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 14:57

>>1
If you got rid of all of those languages, how would you make anything high level or object oriented?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 15:03

>>20
See any other language

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 15:34

>>26
high level
Lisp.
object oriented
Smalltalk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 16:02

Sorry OP, but I work in game development, so I need C++.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 16:25

>>27
Punctuation variables?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 16:31

>>26
In Perl it seems.

Name: Java Suit 2011-05-12 16:47

JAVA

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 17:12

Sorry OP, but I like C++ and C#

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 17:44

LANGUAGES THAT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL

ERLANG
HASKELL
FACTOR
F#
Caml
Ocaml
LISP
SCHEME
ML
SML
PERL
PHP
JAVASCRIPT
D
PASCAL
DELPHI
ADA
COBOL
LUA
GO
FORTRAN
FORTH
PROLOG
SMALLTALK

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 17:44

AIDS was made by THE GOVERNMENT

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 18:06

>>35
Now that's tax money well spent, if I do say so myself.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 18:29

>>34
>SCHEME
DIE AND BURN IN HELL!!!!!!!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 18:42

OP, if you're going to go on a OOP hating rampage, you need to put down smalltalk as well.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 18:50

>>29
Naugthy Dog disagrees.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 19:34

>>39
Naughty Dog does make use of internal developed tools made with C++

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 19:50

>>34
JAVASCRIPT

No.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 20:20

>>37
fuck off and die, lithpfag

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-12 20:23

>>34
FORGOT RACKET

Name: Java Suit 2011-05-12 21:04

how do i fart the new autism?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-13 11:30

only C, perl, and Lisp should exist.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-13 11:34

Lispfags
Your language is shit and the programs you write have too many fucking parentheses. Switch to Java and be ENTERPRISE

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-13 11:35

>>45
i would add ASM and then is all you need.

C/ASM for speed
Lisp for awesomeness
Perl as duct tape.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-13 11:35

>>47
Common Lisp or Scheme?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-13 12:52

>>48
Let the war begin.

>>47
Where's Forth in that?

Name: Java Suit 2011-05-13 16:21

JAVA
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -