Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

OMG a serious question!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 12:12

do u want too work as coder for the rest of u live?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 12:20

>>1
Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 12:43

>>1
Yes. Even when I retire from my six-figure income salary position as a senior software engineer, working a 38 hour week, I will continue to write software on my own. Software development is one of the few professions where you're constantly learning new things all of the time. There is very little to get bored about, unless you fall into the web-facing ENTERPRISE development trap.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 12:50

coder
As code monkey? No thank you!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 13:03

>>1
work as a coder? Never. I enjoy my toy projects in toy languages, that's all.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 14:00

>>5
I think your opinion on such matters as C++ being a horrible language are now null and void. You obviously lack the professional experience to make such a call.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 14:07

>>6
Back to work, Java monkey.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 14:39

>>7
You are mistaken. I am not an enterprise developer. I work in the aerospace industry and we primarily use C++, a bit of assembly language and home-rolled Lisp-like DSLs that generate C++ code. Older systems that need to be occasionally maintained and updated were written in C.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 14:44

>>8
Lisp
oh so you're one of the faggots

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 14:45

>>8
Oh, sorry then, I was thinking you were >>9!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 14:55

>>9
Don't get me wrong. We don't use off-the-shelf CL or Scheme implementations and their runtime systems. We have our own s-expression parser and on top of that we build static analyzers for ensuring program correctness and back-end code generators. We don't use CL/Scheme libraries or idioms. It's largely the syntax we're borrowing with which to create declarative DSLs that precisely model the problem domain, as the syntax is very simple and it's easy to maintain a parser for it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 15:01

>>6
what the fuck?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 15:05

>>12
Yes, it's a reactionary post making wild assumptions, but it goes without saying that the probability of someone who prefers toy languages also has an aversion for C++ is rather high and has most likely voiced this opinion through language bashing on /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 16:27

sepplesucks

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 17:23

i gues if u would delete any post how is about whish language has the bigest penis /prog/ would vanish

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-11 17:31

MORE LIKE
I WANNA WORK AS A CDR
AMIRITE LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZzz!!11oNE!!1ONE1!

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List