/prog/ - is printf shit??

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:13

is printf shit??

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:22

Why would it be?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:23

It is, it's bloated.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:24

yes, it is. write() is the holy grail

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:31

>>3,4

You guys are fucking idiots.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:34

>>1
sprintf is the SUPERIOR print, formatted command

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:58

It is much better to use platform dependent system calls since they give you more control.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 13:04

>>6
http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1294909754/29
(recent studies revealed that the fastest printing function is vasprintf (the very accellerated sprintf))

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 13:04

>>3,6

For fast printf() use fprintf().

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 16:24

Combinator Formatting is the future.

http://synthcode.com/scheme/fmt

Name: nambla_dot_org_rules_you 2011-05-02 16:32

>>9
No you jew. fprintf() has just as much overhead as printf().

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 16:36

>>10
No one cares about your toy language, son.

Name: not >>10 2011-05-02 16:47

>>12
I do. Enjoy repeating the same patterns gramps while I enjoy writing code once for a code pattern and using it everywhere instead of having to slightly reinvent the wheel each time.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 16:51

>>11

No it doesn't, why would they call it \`\`FAST PRINTF\'\' then?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 17:09

>>13
Modules/methods DO YOU KNOW THEM MOTHERFUCKER?

Never, ever re-write code. Ever.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 17:11

>>14
'f' doesn't stand for fast you dumb jew.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 17:12

>>16

Yes it does.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 18:24

>>9
Why use fprintf when you can use vfprintf (very fast printf)?

But be careful not to use vsprintf, it's very slow.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 18:32

>>18
I use vafprintf (very accelerated fast print).

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 20:35

Fast and furious - fast printf

    　　　　　　　　　　　　／￣∧＿∧￣￣￣ //￣＼＼
    　　　　　　＿＿ ⊂／＿＿（´∀｀　）_＿　　/_⊃＿__|　|＼フヽ　　CFLAGS JUST KICKED
    　　　,　 ´＿　　／　　　／￣￣＿_　／￣　ヽ　　　 __ヽ￣￣　|　　IN, YO!
    　　/∠__／―/-。―／――∠＿／＿_∧　　| 　　　　 | ∧＿.|　
    　　,========――´=========＝===/⌒ヽ=|.===＝＝| | ヽ￣〕　
    　 |　＿　　 |GENTOO| 　　＿　″ 　|⌒|　|/　　　_＿ /|　）ノ　　　　vroom
    　）_旧＿∈≡≡≡≡∋＿旧＿″＿||　ノ丿＿ -――┘ 丿　　　　　　vroom!
    　　＼　＼＿ノ￣￣￣三三三＼　＼＿ノ　　　　三三三三　
    　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三
    　　　　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三
    　　　　　　　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三
    　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三
    　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 20:38

sprintf is the fastest C command known to man

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 21:17

puts()

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 9:51

>>22
beat me to the punch.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 10:14

puts() isn't ENTERPRISE enough.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 10:23

>>22,23

It's still slower than fputs which in turn is much slower than vasprintf.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 10:46

>>22-25
SAMEFAG!
MOTHERFUCKING SAMEFAGGING RIGHT HERE
EVERYONE COME SEE! LOOK! IT'S SAMEFAGGING IN ACTION!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 11:14

>>26

You're terrible at spotting posts created by a single author.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 14:57

>>1
no

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 20:43

I wrote my own SSE accelerated vasprintf. It's nearly 3x as fast the equivalent C version!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 22:35

i wrote my one print function that runs in O(1) time!

is printf shit??

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:13

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:22

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:23

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:24

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:31

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:34

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:58

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 13:04

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 13:04

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 16:24

11 Name: nambla_dot_org_rules_you 2011-05-02 16:32

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 16:36

13 Name: not >>10 2011-05-02 16:47

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 16:51

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 17:09

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 17:11

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 17:12

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 18:24

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 18:32

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 20:35

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 20:38

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 21:17

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 9:51

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 10:14

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 10:23

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 10:46

27 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 11:14

28 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 14:57

29 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 20:43

30 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 22:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:22

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:23

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:24

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:31

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:34

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 11:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 13:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 13:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 16:24

Name: nambla_dot_org_rules_you 2011-05-02 16:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 16:36

Name: not >>10 2011-05-02 16:47

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 16:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 17:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 17:11

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 17:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 18:24

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 18:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 20:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 20:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-02 21:17

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 9:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 10:14

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 10:23

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 10:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 11:14

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 14:57

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 20:43

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-03 22:35