Someone who took 6.001 without taking 6.046 would be a shitty programmer and someone who took 6.046 without taking 6.001 would be a shitty programmer. They're orthogonal and both necessary.
>>2
It's not a language-pertinent class, it appears to be more or less a run through CLRS. To the extent that they have to write code they seem to use generic algol-y pseudocode.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-17 1:38
>>4
A language-agnostic course. Hm, I might consider watching this.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-17 1:41
>>4 algol
No. Thanks. C/C++-like languages were obsoleted by LISP long before their filty birth.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-17 1:56
>>6 LISP
No. Thanks. LISP-like languages were obsoleted by every other language long before their filty birth.