Cybersyn was revolutionary. I get hard (intellectually speaking, of course) just by thinking about it.
btw the idea behind Cybersyn was not technocracy in the mind of his creator.
Name:
Anonymous2011-04-02 17:28
>>1
What's /prog/s opinon on a technocracy? pro politicians always outplays technocrats in their own game. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy see Transhumanism
Do you think the Sussman could be the next Stalin? He dislikes personality cults.
Have you ever heard of Project Cybersyn? It was cool for its day. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Cybersyn Way outdated for today control rooms and computer networks.
Why don't girls want to date me? Autism.
In all cases technical and leadership skills are selected through bureaucratic processes on the basis of specialized knowledge and performance, rather than democratic elections.
..who are subject to the same human frailties, weaknesses and corruption as everyone else. In short order becoming just another form of tyranny. (Power corrupts, etc)
>>1
Technocracy? Is that something like putting actually qualified people in charge instead of arts degree students who happen to have highly-placed parents?
I seriously think it's the only clever future and I adhere 100% to technocracy.
We were always shown an evil dictator computer in movies, but that's nonsense. We should work and build a good dictator computer (DAD, the Digitally Assisted Dictator). Humans are fallible.