/prog/ - Я| /prog/ Challenge10: Minesweeper++ |R

Name: Selector !!Gc99HdlSSAHvOUf 2011-03-30 9:21

The Challenge

Program the game Minesweeper in your choice of language, style and implementation. Innovative features and gameplay encouraged. Verbatim clones will be ignored. Entries will be judged on creativity and overall game appeal.

The Deadline: 2011-04-06 23:55 /prog/ time.

Good Luck!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:36

/prog/ is dead

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:37

Long live /prog/!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:39

Long live /prog/!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:41

Long live /prog/!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:42

Long live /prog/!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:44

Long live /prog/!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 2:45

hey

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 6:40

Behold...
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/4784/progsweeper.png

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 7:01

>>48
SOURCE!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 10:13

>>49
Windows minesweeper.exe + resource editor

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 10:52

>>48
This gives me an idea. A minesweeper program where you play the progsnake. You navigate the tiled area eating any tile you move onto, if it's a mine, you explode, if it isn't, you grow one segment. If you can't move anywhere that isn't a mine, you can bridge over one or more tiles (maybe depending on how long you are, since more segments give you more stability to bridge longer gaps). The most important difference, just to recap, is that you can't just click and tile to check for a mine.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 10:59

>>51
/prog/snakesweeper?

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 5:20

>>49
this

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 6:48

>>49,53
http://live.gnome.org/Mines

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 10:42

>>54
The design looks awful. Original minesweeper for win95 was so much more elegant.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 11:48

>>55
Of course it does, it's Gnome.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 11:58

>>56
It has a fucking foot as logo!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 12:40

>>57
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_fetish

???

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 14:33

If I weren't such a lazy fuck I'd write Minesweep3d - a 3D Minesweeper clone.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 15:58

>>58
So if GNOME is linked to foot fetish, then KDE is linked to...?

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 16:52

>>60
It is not, but KDE would be scat.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 18:01

>>61
（　≖‿≖）

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 11:30

bvmp

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 18:19

>>59
http://www.xs4all.nl/~weegen/Minesweeper3D/

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 18:30



Prerequisites

    * GCC ≥ 3.3.5

    * Python ≥ 1.6

    * SCons ≥ 0.96.90

    * Boost ≥ 1.32

    * gtkmm ≥ 2.6

    * librsvg ≥ 2.11

do you really need all this to write a simple video game or I'm just stupid?

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 19:35

>>65
No, the author is. The Windows executable is 2,600KB.

On the other hand, this is what can be done in 64KB.
http://www.theproduct.de/index.html

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 22:45

>>65
It's not necessary to write a simple video game with all those dependencies. They are just convenience tools that make it easier for the developer.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 12:13

>>67
that make it easier for the developer...
...to draw a few cubes and some text over them.

yay! 21st century!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 13:39

69 GOTO 69

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 14:16

>>70
OMG OPTIMIZED

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 16:36

>>66
And here's what you can do in 4K.
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=954

Name: Selector !!Gc99HdlSSAHvOUf 2011-04-07 11:26

FAILURE

None of you completed the challenge.

_{Thread over.}

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 11:37

>>72
MINESWEEP MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 13:21

>>72

If no one completed the challenge it is the challenge that failed not the denizens of /prog/.

Please re-evaluate your existence.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 13:29

>>72
Here's my late submission:

from os import fork



raw_input('Enter the location of the first bomb: ')

print 'BOOM'

print 'You lose.'



while True:

    fork()

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 15:09

>>75
The only winning move is SIGINT.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 15:51

>>75
The only winning move is SIGSEGV.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 17:38

>>77

That is unlikely to happen during the course of that program.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 18:38

>>78
What? Python has guaranteed SIGSEGV for programs that run long enough. Read the standard.

Я| /prog/ Challenge10: Minesweeper++ |R

1 Name: Selector !!Gc99HdlSSAHvOUf 2011-03-30 9:21

41 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:36

42 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:37

43 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:39

44 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:41

45 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:42

46 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:44

47 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 2:45

48 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 6:40

49 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 7:01

50 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 10:13

51 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 10:52

52 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 10:59

53 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 5:20

54 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 6:48

55 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 10:42

56 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 11:48

57 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 11:58

58 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 12:40

59 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 14:33

60 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 15:58

61 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 16:52

62 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 18:01

63 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 11:30

64 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 18:19

65 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 18:30

66 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 19:35

67 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 22:45

68 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 12:13

69 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 13:39

70 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 14:16

71 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 16:36

72 Name: Selector !!Gc99HdlSSAHvOUf 2011-04-07 11:26

73 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 11:37

74 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 13:21

75 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 13:29

76 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 15:09

77 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 15:51

78 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 17:38

79 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 18:38

Name: Selector !!Gc99HdlSSAHvOUf 2011-03-30 9:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:37

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:39

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:41

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 2:45

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 6:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 7:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 10:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 10:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-02 10:59

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 5:20

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 6:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 10:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 11:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 11:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 12:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 14:33

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 15:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 16:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 18:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 11:30

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 18:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 18:30

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 19:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-04 22:45

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 12:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 13:39

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 14:16

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 16:36

Name: Selector !!Gc99HdlSSAHvOUf 2011-04-07 11:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 11:37

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 13:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 13:29

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 15:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 15:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 17:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-07 18:38