Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

AUTISM [part XKCD]

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 6:20

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 6:27

I see that the clutch of autism tightens around rand(all).

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 6:34

Hahaha oh wow wait, what?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 13:40

ITT: We post xkcd comics that show blatant autism on the behalf of the author.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 13:54

>>4
So, all of them?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 14:20

ITT: nerds veiledly calling other nerds ``nerds''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 14:25

>>6
you don't belong here, ``neurotypical''

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 14:32

http://autism.emedtv.com/autism/autism-statistics.html
66 Therefore, it can be summarized that between 1 in 500 (2/1,000) to 1 in 166 children (6/1,000) have autism. 99

I bet they are all INTJ (which, if you remember, makes up for 1% of the population).

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 15:03

>>8
I'm INTJ but I'm not autistic. Feels good man.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 15:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 15:49

>>10
XKCD makes me think that the author is douche.  That's about it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 16:23

It's funny, because it's just ripping off "Index" with its "awesome creative graph comics"

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 17:24

randall = xarn

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 17:40

>>10
This. The author may be smart, but the comics aren't. They are just a pretentious vehicle for Randall to show the world how smart and excentric he is, while containing little to no actual humor (which is pretty stupid for a webcomic). His followers like the damn thing because getting the ``jokes'' and references makes them feel as if they're as smart and excentric as the author, and thus special, instead of just misfits (which is what they probably if they have to cling to a unfunny webcomic to have a sense of self-worth).

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 17:43

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 19:42

no actual humor (which is pretty stupid for a webcomic
Well, some webcomics try to be serious works, but it's not like XKCD could pass for that either.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 21:31

>>9
Stop fooling you'rself.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 22:56

>>17
you'rself
stop that

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-09 23:46

>>18
yo'ure a faget

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-10 1:00

>>18
yo'''u''''r'e' gay

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-10 5:02

I don't know what is worse - comic or on-cover text

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-10 5:12

>>1
Agreed. Set theory and real numbers are for autists. Healthy people don't need this evil religious crap.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-10 5:16

BTW, `sqrt` in "sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)" is completly unnecessary in practice.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-10 6:12

>>22
I see that you're still autistic.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-10 9:43

>>24
Don't see his fucking posts!

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 3:33

>>14
To be honest he did omit the ``humor'' part in the webcomic description.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 3:34

>>26
He omitted "stupid" too. What's your point, mr ThakYouNoSage?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 3:48

>>27
Randall is smarter than you! He worked for NASA!

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 4:21

>>25
You're autistic as well, I see.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 4:27

>>28
If he is so smart, why do he make a living drawing crappy comix about ugly jewish math and set theory?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 4:32

>>30
Because he's a jew and begs for a real holocaust, when pests like him at last go extinct for their evil deeds.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 5:03

>>28
NASA worked for me. Where is your rand(all) now?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 7:40

>>32
You seem autistic...

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 7:43

>>33
You are retarded.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-11 8:38

>>34
At least I'm not an autist...

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List