>>19
Are you retarded? Why would I need to use pointers in my Universal Template Touring Machine?
OK, since you most probably really are not very bright, I'll spare myself some trouble and spell it out clearly: the C++ template language is not bound by any of the important C restrictions.
Therefore I can, for example, write a template program which would require >4Gb of memory to evaluate, and would produce a single byte -- say, the LSB of the number of iterations it performed.
Then I can use a 64-bit compiler to produce the program which outputs that byte on a 16-bit architecture. Note that sizeof(void*) would be defined during the template expansion, and would be equal to 2, it's just that my program doesn't and actually can't give a fuck.
This is possible in C++ but not possible in C.
>>34,32
Says who? Not the C standard, that's who.
ISO/IEC 9899:TC2, 7.19.1 Introduction, the second fucking paragraph, bitch. You better use your whore mouth for sucking dicks 'cause you only produce bad smell when you try to participate in an intelligent discussion.
>>37
So how do you allocate additional memory?